Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66575
Title: Accuracy of computer-assisted vertical cup-to-disk ratio grading for glaucoma screening
Authors: Blake M. Snyder
Sang Min Nam
Preeyanuch Khunsongkiet
Sakarin Ausayakhun
Thidarat Leeungurasatien
Maxwell R. Leiter
Artem Sevastopolsky
Ashlin S. Joye
Elyse J. Berlinberg
Yingna Liu
David A. Ramirez
Caitlin A. Moe
Somsanguan Ausayakhun
Robert L. Stamper
Jeremy D. Keenan
Authors: Blake M. Snyder
Sang Min Nam
Preeyanuch Khunsongkiet
Sakarin Ausayakhun
Thidarat Leeungurasatien
Maxwell R. Leiter
Artem Sevastopolsky
Ashlin S. Joye
Elyse J. Berlinberg
Yingna Liu
David A. Ramirez
Caitlin A. Moe
Somsanguan Ausayakhun
Robert L. Stamper
Jeremy D. Keenan
Keywords: Agricultural and Biological Sciences;Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology;Multidisciplinary
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2019
Abstract: © 2019 Snyder et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Purpose Glaucoma screening can be performed by assessing the vertical-cup-to-disk ratio (VCDR) of the optic nerve head from fundus photography, but VCDR grading is inherently subjective. This study investigated whether computer software could improve the accuracy and repeatability of VCDR assessment. Methods In this cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study, 5 ophthalmologists independently assessed the VCDR from a set of 200 optic disk images, with the median grade used as the reference standard for subsequent analyses. Eight non-ophthalmologists graded each image by two different methods: by visual inspection and with assistance from a custom-made publicly available software program. Agreement with the reference standard grade was assessed for each method by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the sensitivity and specificity determined relative to a median ophthalmologist grade of 0.7. Results VCDR grades ranged from 0.1 to 0.9 for visual assessment and from 0.1 to 1.0 for software-assisted grading, with a median grade of 0.4 for each. Agreement between each of the 8 graders and the reference standard was higher for visual inspection (median ICC 0.65, interquartile range 0.57 to 0.82) than for software-assisted grading (median ICC 0.59, IQR 0.44 to 0.71); P = 0.02, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Visual inspection and software assistance had similar sensitivity and specificity for detecting glaucomatous cupping. Conclusion The computer software used in this study did not improve the reproducibility or validity of VCDR grading from fundus photographs compared with simple visual inspection. More clinical experience was correlated with higher agreement with the ophthalmologist VCDR reference standard.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070328522&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66575
ISSN: 19326203
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.