Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66575
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBlake M. Snyderen_US
dc.contributor.authorSang Min Namen_US
dc.contributor.authorPreeyanuch Khunsongkieten_US
dc.contributor.authorSakarin Ausayakhunen_US
dc.contributor.authorThidarat Leeungurasatienen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell R. Leiteren_US
dc.contributor.authorArtem Sevastopolskyen_US
dc.contributor.authorAshlin S. Joyeen_US
dc.contributor.authorElyse J. Berlinbergen_US
dc.contributor.authorYingna Liuen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid A. Ramirezen_US
dc.contributor.authorCaitlin A. Moeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomsanguan Ausayakhunen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert L. Stamperen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeremy D. Keenanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-16T12:47:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-16T12:47:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85070328522en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1371/journal.pone.0220362en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070328522&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66575-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Snyder et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Purpose Glaucoma screening can be performed by assessing the vertical-cup-to-disk ratio (VCDR) of the optic nerve head from fundus photography, but VCDR grading is inherently subjective. This study investigated whether computer software could improve the accuracy and repeatability of VCDR assessment. Methods In this cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study, 5 ophthalmologists independently assessed the VCDR from a set of 200 optic disk images, with the median grade used as the reference standard for subsequent analyses. Eight non-ophthalmologists graded each image by two different methods: by visual inspection and with assistance from a custom-made publicly available software program. Agreement with the reference standard grade was assessed for each method by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the sensitivity and specificity determined relative to a median ophthalmologist grade of 0.7. Results VCDR grades ranged from 0.1 to 0.9 for visual assessment and from 0.1 to 1.0 for software-assisted grading, with a median grade of 0.4 for each. Agreement between each of the 8 graders and the reference standard was higher for visual inspection (median ICC 0.65, interquartile range 0.57 to 0.82) than for software-assisted grading (median ICC 0.59, IQR 0.44 to 0.71); P = 0.02, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Visual inspection and software assistance had similar sensitivity and specificity for detecting glaucomatous cupping. Conclusion The computer software used in this study did not improve the reproducibility or validity of VCDR grading from fundus photographs compared with simple visual inspection. More clinical experience was correlated with higher agreement with the ophthalmologist VCDR reference standard.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinaryen_US
dc.titleAccuracy of computer-assisted vertical cup-to-disk ratio grading for glaucoma screeningen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitlePLoS ONEen_US
article.volume14en_US
article.stream.affiliationsSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technologyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of California, San Franciscoen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences Centeren_US
article.stream.affiliationsCollege of Medicine, Pochon CHA Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsYouth Laboratories LLCen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.