การวิเคราะห์ทฤษฎีวิศวกรรมสังคมของรอสโค พาวนด์

Abstract

This research, A Study of the Concept of Social Engineering, is set to analyze two main points of objectives which are: - 1) the components, origins, and main objectives of Roscoe Pound's social engineering theory, and 2) the foundation of Sound's social engineering concept. There is a basis for sharing the benefits of social engineering concepts or ethical concepts of utilitarianism. By using ethics as a framework for education Analyzed through the pound concept of his books and articles. The results of the study showed that Pound's concept of social engineering theory is a theory that is made up of three main theoretical concepts: 1. Social Engineering as a framework for exploring social structures 2. Sociology of Laws and Sociological Jurisprudence. Responsible for dealing with claims Needs and desires of people in society to be harmonious and cause as few problems as possible 3. Utilitarianism The aim of the concept of the pound's interests, though, is not the happiness of most people first But ultimately, the hierarchy of benefits must be made so that social interests are superior to all interests based on Bentham's conceptual benefit. In the field of interests, The meaning of the word interest from the concept of Pound's engineering theory is based on the concept of utilitarianism. But not the benefit that is homogeneous to the concept of Mill or Bantham. Pound then chose to use the word “Interest” because of the American social change that leaped from agriculture to industry. To keep the law in pace with the industrialized world Structural reforms of the law, therefore, rely on social reforms based on individual requirements and view their needs as a basis for problem-solving and meeting needs. Private interests are part of the objectives. To connect the interests of the public and society, not the happiness of most people in society, is the sole goal. In the utility, happiness must be calculated, and happiness is weighed. The legal process by an engineer lawyer is unable to calculate that happiness and suffering purely. Because the needs of each person are not equal Adjustment or coordination of interests is required by the law to permit or enforce. Even when punished for suffering Moral right and wrong cannot be calculated based on social needs. It simply wants to benefit most of society by following the traditional utility-based approach of social engineering theory. It is enough to finally balance the hierarchy of benefits. In conclusion, the benefits of Pound's theory are simply sketching a list that may be interchangeable for different eras. It cannot be defined clearly how to prioritize Because of ethics, benefits, and the style of Bentham with Mill It determines the quantity and quality of happiness. But in Pound's social engineering concept, happiness was not emphasized. Emphasize only the needs that must be met in the form of the basic needs of life in a modern changing society and secure their legitimate interests.