Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73678
Title: การศึกษาเปรียบเทียบรังสีคณิตเทคนิครังสีรักษาสามมิติโดยใช้จุดร่วมเดียวของลำรังสีในผู้ป่วยมะเร็งเต้านมข้างซ้ายที่ได้รับการผ่าตัดทั้งเต้า
Other Titles: Dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional radiotherapy technique by using single isocenter in left-sided breast cancer patients after mastectomy
Authors: อนุพงษ์ คงสา
Authors: อิ่มใจ ชิตาพนารักษ์
สมศักดิ์ วรรณวิไลรัตน์
อนุพงษ์ คงสา
Issue Date: May-2021
Publisher: เชียงใหม่ : บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่
Abstract: Introduction: A numerous patients of breast cancer is recently increasing. The sophisticated techniques benefit the treatment qualities, but the limitations are raised in term of the treatment preparation steps and time. The three-dimensional radiation therapy is necessarily used to serve these population, but the limitation is the method of the field junction. Various method was proposed to solve this problem, but the limitations are remained. This research aims to propose a new matching method and compare various methods in three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) for left breast post mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Method: The twenty-two CT data sets of left breast PMRT patient were used. Three single isocenter techniques (SIT), with off-axis supraclavicular field (SIToaSPC) method SIT with coplanar field border (SITCFB) method and SIT with half beam block (SITHBB) method, were created. The dosimetric parameters of organ at risk (OARs), lymph node level I-III and region of interest at gap junction (ROIg) were analyze and used to compare plans. The HBB was benchmarked to grant the score of the decision. Result: The results show the SIToaSPC method gave a low dose on the organs at risk (OAR) but ROlg was lower than prescribed dose. The SITCFB and SITHBB methods were shown the same dosimetric results of OARs but the SITHBB method was shown higher volume of the ipsilateral lung that receive 20 Gy than n SIToaSPC method. The decision score of The SITCFB method was higher than the SIToaSPC method and also slightly better than the SITHBB method. Conclusion: The SITCFB method shows benefit of OAR sparing and dose at matching field. The decision score ensures a performance of SITCFB is comparable to the SITHBB method. Furthermore, field size limitation of the SITHBB method was solved.
URI: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73678
Appears in Collections:MED: Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
620731016 อนุพงษ์ คงสา.pdf11.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.