Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71599
Title: | Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Thai Herbal Formulation-6 in the Treatment of Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized-Controlled Trial |
Authors: | Nut Koonrungsesomboon Saowaros Nopnithipat Supanimit Teekachunhatean Natthakarn Chiranthanut Chaichan Sangdee Sunee Chansakaow Pramote Tipduangta Nutthiya Hanprasertpong |
Authors: | Nut Koonrungsesomboon Saowaros Nopnithipat Supanimit Teekachunhatean Natthakarn Chiranthanut Chaichan Sangdee Sunee Chansakaow Pramote Tipduangta Nutthiya Hanprasertpong |
Keywords: | Medicine |
Issue Date: | 1-Jan-2020 |
Abstract: | © 2020 Nut Koonrungsesomboon et al. Background. Osteoarthritis of the knee is the most common form of arthritis. Identifying effective and safe herbal formulations that are locally available is viewed as a priority for sustainable development in a region. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Thai herbal formulation-6 (THF-6) in comparison with oral diclofenac in patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis of the knee. Methods. This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority trial randomly assigned patients with osteoarthritis of the knee to receive either THF-6 or diclofenac for four weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in knee pain as measured by a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included knee stiffness, a stair climb test, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and safety parameters. Outcomes were assessed on a biweekly basis. Modified intention-to-treat (MITT) and perprotocol (PP) analyses were applied. Results. A total of 200 patients were enrolled of whom 175 (87.5%) were included in the MITT analysis and 153 (76.5%) in the PP analysis. The mean change in VAS pain did not differ between the two groups, and the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for comparison between the two groups was within the prespecified margin of 10 mm for noninferiority (MITT analysis: mean difference = 0.86, 95% CI =-4.39 to 6.10, p=0.748; PP analysis: mean difference = 1.98, 95% CI =-3.61 to 7.56, p=0.486). Significant improvement was observed in all the efficacy parameters in both groups. Dyspepsia was the most common adverse event: 23 patients in the THF-6 group and 28 in the diclofenac group p=0.417. Conclusions. THF-6 offers an alternative to oral diclofenac for the short-term treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. It was shown to be noninferior to oral diclofenac in relieving knee pain. This trial is registered with ChiCTR-IPR-15007213. |
URI: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098091045&origin=inward http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71599 |
ISSN: | 17414288 1741427X |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.