Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57609
Title: GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process
Authors: Kevin Pottie
Vivian Welch
Rachael Morton
Elie A. Akl
Javier H. Eslava-Schmalbach
Vittal Katikireddi
Jasvinder Singh
Lorenzo Moja
Eddy Lang
Nicola Magrini
Lehana Thabane
Roger Stanev
Elizabeth Matovinovic
Alexandra Snellman
Matthias Briel
Beverly Shea
Peter Tugwell
Holger Schunemann
Gordon Guyatt
Pablo Alonso-Coello
Authors: Kevin Pottie
Vivian Welch
Rachael Morton
Elie A. Akl
Javier H. Eslava-Schmalbach
Vittal Katikireddi
Jasvinder Singh
Lorenzo Moja
Eddy Lang
Nicola Magrini
Lehana Thabane
Roger Stanev
Elizabeth Matovinovic
Alexandra Snellman
Matthias Briel
Beverly Shea
Peter Tugwell
Holger Schunemann
Gordon Guyatt
Pablo Alonso-Coello
Keywords: Medicine
Issue Date: 1-Oct-2017
Abstract: © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Objectives The aim of this paper is to provide detailed guidance on how to incorporate health equity within the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence) evidence to decision process. Study Design and Setting We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decision framework, iteratively reviewing and modifying draft documents, in person discussion of project group members and input from other GRADE members. Results Considering the impact on health equity may be required, both in general guidelines and guidelines that focus on disadvantaged populations. We suggest two approaches to incorporate equity considerations: (1) assessing the potential impact of interventions on equity and (2) incorporating equity considerations when judging or weighing each of the evidence to decision criteria. We provide guidance and include illustrative examples. Conclusion Guideline panels should consider the impact of recommendations on health equity with attention to remote and underserviced settings and disadvantaged populations. Guideline panels may wish to incorporate equity judgments across the evidence to decision framework. This is the fourth and final paper in a series about considering equity in the GRADE guideline development process. This series is coming from the GRADE equity subgroup.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028671735&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57609
ISSN: 18785921
08954356
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.