Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52646
Title: A Delphi exercise to identify characteristic features of gout - Opinions from patients and physicians, the first stage in developing new classification criteria
Authors: Rebecca L. Prowse
Nicola Dalbeth
Arthur Kavanaugh
Adewale O. Adebajo
Angelo L. Gaffo
Robert Terkeltaub
Brian F. Mandell
Bagus P.P. Suryana
Claudia Goldenstein-Schainberg
Cèsar Diaz-Torne
Dinesh Khanna
Frederic Lioté
Geraldine McCarthy
Gail S. Kerr
Hisashi Yamanaka
Hein Janssens
Herbert F. Baraf
Jiunn Horng Chen
Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado
Leslie R. Harrold
Lisa K. Stamp
Mart A. Van De Laar
Matthijs Janssen
Michael Doherty
Maarten Boers
N. Lawrence Edwards
Peter Gow
Peter Chapman
Puja Khanna
Philip S. Helliwell
Rebecca Grainger
H. Ralph Schumacher
Tuhina Neogi
Tim L. Jansen
Worawit Louthrenoo
Francisca Sivera
William J. Taylor
Authors: Rebecca L. Prowse
Nicola Dalbeth
Arthur Kavanaugh
Adewale O. Adebajo
Angelo L. Gaffo
Robert Terkeltaub
Brian F. Mandell
Bagus P.P. Suryana
Claudia Goldenstein-Schainberg
Cèsar Diaz-Torne
Dinesh Khanna
Frederic Lioté
Geraldine McCarthy
Gail S. Kerr
Hisashi Yamanaka
Hein Janssens
Herbert F. Baraf
Jiunn Horng Chen
Janitzia Vazquez-Mellado
Leslie R. Harrold
Lisa K. Stamp
Mart A. Van De Laar
Matthijs Janssen
Michael Doherty
Maarten Boers
N. Lawrence Edwards
Peter Gow
Peter Chapman
Puja Khanna
Philip S. Helliwell
Rebecca Grainger
H. Ralph Schumacher
Tuhina Neogi
Tim L. Jansen
Worawit Louthrenoo
Francisca Sivera
William J. Taylor
Keywords: Immunology and Microbiology;Medicine
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2013
Abstract: Objective. To identify a comprehensive list of features that might discriminate between gout and other rheumatic musculoskeletal conditions, to be used subsequently for a case-control study to develop and test new classification criteria for gout. Methods. Two Delphi exercises were conducted using Web-based questionnaires: one with physicians from several countries who had an interest in gout and one with patients from New Zealand who had gout. Physicians rated a list of potentially discriminating features that were identified by literature review and expert opinion, and patients rated a list of features that they generated themselves. Agreement was defined by the RAND/UCLA disagreement index. Results. Forty-four experienced physicians and 9 patients responded to all iterations. For physicians, 71 items were identified by literature review and 15 more were suggested by physicians. The physician survey showed agreement for 26 discriminatory features and 15 as not discriminatory. The patients identified 46 features of gout, for which there was agreement on 25 items as being discriminatory and 7 items as not discriminatory. Conclusion. Patients and physicians agreed upon several key features of gout. Physicians emphasized objective findings, imaging, and patterns of symptoms, whereas patients emphasized severity, functional results, and idiographic perception of symptoms. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright © 2013. All rights reserved.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84875864600&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52646
ISSN: 14992752
0315162X
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.