Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45945
Title: รูปแบบการประเมินระบบการประกันคุณภาพภายในของโรงเรียนศึกษาพิเศษ
Other Titles: The Internal Quality Assurance Evaluation Model of Special Education Schools
Authors: เกียรติสุดา ศรีสุข
อนุรักษ์ ปัญญานุวัตน์
สมศักดิ์ ภู่วิภาดาวรรธน์
Anan Kaewtatip
อนันต์ แก้วตาติ๊บ
Keywords: Special education
Quality Assurance
Issue Date: Jul-2014
Publisher: เชียงใหม่ : บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่
Abstract: The objective of this research is threefold which are 1) to develop the components and indicators for evaluating the internal quality assurance of special education school,2) to develop a model and manual for evaluating the internal quality assurance, and 3)to test the trial use of the model and the manual for evaluating the developed internal quality assurance. The research implementation is divided into three steps as the followings. Step 1 develops components and indicators for evaluating internal quality assurance of special education school through the synthesis of documents to select the components, ask for opinion on the indicators from administrators and personnel of special education school (a total of 105 people). The tool for the research is composed of (1)the record form on the synthesis of components and indicators,(2)the questionnaire on indicators for implementing the internal quality assurance, and (3) the questionnaire on the propriety of the indicators for evaluating internal quality assurance. The statistics used for analysis are frequencies, means, standard deviations, Correlation Analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Step2 develops the model and manual for evaluating the internal quality assurance through the syntheses of documents gathered by brainstorming of administrators and personnel of special education school (a total of seven people).Step 2 also checks the propriety of the school context and the usability of the model for evaluating the internal quality assurance from the administrators and experts (a total of 10 people). The tool used for this research are (1) the record form on brainstorming, (2) the evaluation form on attitude towards the evaluation model, (3) the evaluation form on propriety and feasibility of indicators, and (4) the evaluation form on propriety and feasibility for launching the model to use. The statistics used are means and standard deviations.Step 3 attempts to study the results of the trial use of the model and the manual for evaluating the internal quality assurance with one special education school. There are six evaluators. The tools used are (1) the check form of document evidence of indicators for internal quality assurance, (2) the record form on observing the internal quality assurance,(3) the evaluation form on satisfaction, and(4) the evaluation form on the quality of the model and the manual for evaluating the internal quality assurance. The statistics used are frequency distributions, means, and standard deviations. The research findings show the following results. 1. The component and indicators for internal quality assurance of special education school have three main components which are component (1) preparation before evaluation, (2) implementation to evaluate, and (3) reporting of the results of evaluation. There are 10 indicators involved in these components. 2. The evaluation model for internal quality assurance of special education school is composed of the objectives of evaluation of the factors that the evaluators need to evaluate. There are also indicators andcriteria for evaluating the tools for evaluation as well as set duration of evaluation. 3. The results of the trial use of developed model and manual for evaluating internal quality assurance of special education school show that the model and developed manual can be used by the administrators and personnel of special education school to evaluate the internal quality assurance in the school. The evaluation results on the quality of the model and the manual of evaluation on the usability, feasibility, propriety and accuracy are in the highest level.
URI: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/45945
Appears in Collections:EDU: Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ABSTRACT.pdfABSTRACT240.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
APPENDIX.pdfAPPENDIX1.9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
CHAPTER 1.pdfCHAPTER 1387.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
CHAPTER 2.pdfCHAPTER 2738.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
CHAPTER 3.pdfCHAPTER 3527.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
CHAPTER 4.pdfCHAPTER 4623.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
CHAPTER 5.pdfCHAPTER 5207.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
CONTENT.pdfCONTENT1.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
COVER.pdfCOVER1.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
REFERENCE.pdfREFERENCE198.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.