Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/39662
Title: | แนวทางการดำเนินงานนิเทศภายในของโรงเรียนเทพเสด็จวิทยา อำเภอดอยสะเก็ด จังหวัดเชียงใหม่ |
Other Titles: | รุจิรา หยดย้อย |
Authors: | รุจิรา หยดย้อย |
Authors: | อาจารย์ ดร. ยงยุทธ ยะบุญธง รองศาสตราจารย์ ดร. ชูชีพ พุทธประเสริฐ รุจิรา หยดย้อย |
Issue Date: | Aug-2015 |
Publisher: | เชียงใหม่ : บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่ |
Abstract: | This independent study has 2 objectives which are 1) to study the problem and solution guideline of collegial supervision in Thep Sadej Wittaya School, Doi Saket District, Chiang Mai Province and 2) to study the guidelines for Collegial Supervision in Thep Sadej Wittaya School, Doi Saket District, Chiang Mai Province There are 3 procedures of this study. 1) Studying the problem and solution guidelines of collegial supervision in Thep Sadej Wittaya School, Doi Saket District, Chiang Mai Province The populations used in this study were school principal, vise-principal and teachers of Thep Sadej Wittaya School in the academic year 2014. The tool used in this study was questionnaire and the data was analyzed by inductive inference. 2) Studying and draft the guidelines for collegial supervision in Thep Sadej Wittaya School. The populations used in this study were the directors of the school, who have won the primary prize for excellent administration in both primary and elementary level from the Chiang Mai Primary Education Service Area 1. The tool used in this study was questionnaire and the data was analyzed by inductive inference. 3) To examine the guideline of collegial supervision. The populations for this study were 5 experts and the tool used in this study was the examination form of possibility, suitability, and usefulness. The data was analyzed by using average (µ) and standard deviation (σ). From the study, it founds that the problem of quality management are 1) teachers don’t have enough time or chance to present their information and the process to authorize the education. 2) Teachers have less chance to participate in the planning process. 3) Supervisor and teachers are not good enough and less of media tools. They need to develop in media tools for education. 4) The supervisor of the operation is not consistent. Small group of supervisor cannot provide in-depth advice for teachers. 5) The criteria of evaluation and report are not quite good. Teachers don’t have much chance to set the criteria of the evaluation. The evaluation and the report of collegial supervision are not official and lack of document that can be used to improve teacher. The guidelines of collegial supervision in Thep Sadej Wittaya School, Doi Saket District are assigning the board of directors to study and solve the problem by letting the teachers participate in their education data, plans, selection collaborative, media tools and the develop a multifaceted approach. Encouraging the implementation of internal, supervisor should set the target of evaluation and have a formal document reports to improve the teachers’ performance. The results of possibility, suitability and usefulness were in the highest level. |
URI: | http://repository.cmu.ac.th/handle/6653943832/39662 |
Appears in Collections: | EDU: Independent Study (IS) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ABSTRACT.docx | Abstract | 180.46 kB | Microsoft Word XML | View/Open |
ABSTRACT.pdf | Abstract | 433.47 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
FULL.pdf | Full IS | 3.88 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.