Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/77235
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThanyaluck Sriboonreungen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirakrit Leelarungrayuben_US
dc.contributor.authorAraya Yankaien_US
dc.contributor.authorRungthip Puntumetakulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:24:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:24:59Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn11795484en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85102881454en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1177/11795484211004494en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102881454&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/77235-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To identify the correlations and possible predicted equations of maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory mouth pressure (MEP) values from pulmonary function test (PFT), demographics, and anthropometrics. Methods: This study involved 217 healthy participants (91 males and 126 females) aged 19 to 50 years. The PFT (forced vital capacity; FVC, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FEV1, maximal mid-expiratory flow; MMEF, and peak expiratory flow; PEF) was performed by spirometry, whereas MIP and MEP were evaluated by a respiratory pressure meter. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression, with the stepwise method, were used for statistical analysis. Results: The MIP and MEP had a significant positive correlation with weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference. MIP had a significant positive correlation with FVC (%) and PEF (L/s and %), as well as a negative correlation with FEV1/FVC (ratio and %) and MMEF (%). Whereas, MEP showed a significant positive correlation with PEF (L/s and %) and negative correlation with FEV1/FVC (ratio and %) and MMEF (L/s). Finally, the predicted MIP and MEP equations were 103.988−97.70 × FEV1/FVC + 31.292 × Sex (male = 1 and female = 0) + 0.662 × PEF (%) and 47.384 + 3.603 × PEF (L/s)−9.514 × MMEF(L/s) + 30.458 × Sex (male = 1 and female = 0) + 0.534 × PEF (%), respectively. Conclusion: The respiratory muscle strengths can be predicted from the pulmonary function test, and gender data.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCorrelation and Predicted Equations of MIP/MEP from the Pulmonary Function, Demographics and Anthropometrics in Healthy Thai Participants aged 19 to 50 Yearsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleClinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicineen_US
article.volume15en_US
article.stream.affiliationsKhon Kaen Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.