Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/77013
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJirarat Jiratham-Opasen_US
dc.contributor.authorNarawudt Prasertwitayakijen_US
dc.contributor.authorTeerapat Nantsupawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorWanwarang Wongcharoenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:21:28Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:21:28Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18832148en_US
dc.identifier.issn18804276en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85111876116en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1002/joa3.12574en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111876116&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/77013-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation rate has been increasing worldwide. Despite proper surgical technique and preincisional intravenous antibiotics, the incidence of infected CIED remains high and leads to serious complications. When encountered with CIED infection, complete CIED system removal is indicated. Several lead extraction approaches have shown a high success rate. However, the facilities are limited in Thailand. In our current practice, we perform lead extraction using the Dotter basket snare femoral approach as our primary method. There are no prior data on this countertraction-assisted transfemoral technique. Therefore, we aim to study the procedural outcome of countertraction-assisted transfemoral lead removal technique of CIED infection in Thai patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CIED infection and with a history of device infection were retrospectively included. Simple manual removal was performed. In case of failure, we proceeded with the modified countertraction-assisted transfemoral technique. Results: There were 35 patients in the study. The success rate was 94.3%. Most of the leads, 62.8%, were removed by simple manual traction. In the 37.1% who required further femoral approach lead extractions, procedural failure was observed in 5.7% and procedure-related adverse events in 5.6%. CIED infection-related death accounted for 5.7% and nosocomial infection-related death, 2.8%. Conclusion: The success rate of CIED infection lead explant and countertraction-assisted transfemoral lead extraction technique was high with small complications and can be performed without advanced facilities. However, the procedure required a main center with a cardiovascular thoracic surgery support team.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleProcedural outcome of lead explant and countertraction-assisted femoral lead extraction in Thai patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infectionen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Arrhythmiaen_US
article.volume37en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.