Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76968
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThitiya Wangkawanen_US
dc.contributor.authorCynthia Laien_US
dc.contributor.authorPeeraya Munkhetviten_US
dc.contributor.authorTrevor Yungen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupaporn Chinchaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:20:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:20:55Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn10114564en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85119200121en_US
dc.identifier.other10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_10_20en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85119200121&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76968-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Interference control is the cognitive control needed to prevent interference due to competition of relevant and irrelevant information that closely related to working memory. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory of children with ADHD. Methods: The participants included thirty children with ADHD and thirty normal control children aged 7-12 years old. All children took the computerized test of visuospatial working memory assessment. The test comprised the N-back and running Memory tasks divided into three conditions: noninterference, auditory interference, and visual interference in three levels of difficulty. Results: The results revealed that there was a significant difference in N-back with auditory interference (t = 2.13, P = 0.04) and N-back with visual interference task (t = 2.48, P = 0.02) between normal control children and children with ADHD. However, there was no significant difference in N-back with noninterference task (t = 1.61, P = 0.11) between normal control children and children with ADHD. There was a significant difference in running memory with noninterference (t = 5.34, P ≤ 0.001), running memory with auditory interference (t = 6.23, P ≤ 0.001), and running memory with visual interference task (t = 5.86, P ≤ 0.001) between normal control children and children with ADHD. In addition, the comparison of the mean score revealed that children with ADHD had poorer performance of interference control on visuospatial working memory tasks than normal control children in overall tasks. Conclusion: Children with ADHD exhibited inefficient control over themselves, especially in the interference condition tasks in which they performed more error responses when interacting in the tasks. The present study supports the evidence-based mechanisms of auditory and visual interference control in visuospatial working memory of children with ADHD.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEffects of auditory and visual interference control on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHDen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Medical Sciences (Taiwan)en_US
article.volume41en_US
article.stream.affiliationsHong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.