Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75695
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNitchanant Kitcharananten_US
dc.contributor.authorPojchong Chotiyarnwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorThiraphat Tanphiriyakunen_US
dc.contributor.authorEkasame Vanitcharoenkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorChantas Mahaisavariyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWichian Boonyaprapaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAasis Unnanuntanaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:01:56Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:01:56Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712318en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85130724924en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12877-022-03152-xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130724924&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75695-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Fragility hip fracture increases morbidity and mortality in older adult patients, especially within the first year. Identification of patients at high risk of death facilitates modification of associated perioperative factors that can reduce mortality. Various machine learning algorithms have been developed and are widely used in healthcare research, particularly for mortality prediction. This study aimed to develop and internally validate 7 machine learning models to predict 1-year mortality after fragility hip fracture. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with fragility hip fractures from a single center (Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand) from July 2016 to October 2018. A total of 492 patients were enrolled. They were randomly categorized into a training group (344 cases, 70%) or a testing group (148 cases, 30%). Various machine learning techniques were used: the Gradient Boosting Classifier (GB), Random Forests Classifier (RF), Artificial Neural Network Classifier (ANN), Logistic Regression Classifier (LR), Naive Bayes Classifier (NB), Support Vector Machine Classifier (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors Classifier (KNN). All models were internally validated by evaluating their performance and the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: For the testing dataset, the accuracies were GB model = 0.93, RF model = 0.95, ANN model = 0.94, LR model = 0.91, NB model = 0.89, SVM model = 0.90, and KNN model = 0.90. All models achieved high AUCs that ranged between 0.81 and 0.99. The RF model also provided a negative predictive value of 0.96, a positive predictive value of 0.93, a specificity of 0.99, and a sensitivity of 0.68. Conclusions: Our machine learning approach facilitated the successful development of an accurate model to predict 1-year mortality after fragility hip fracture. Several machine learning algorithms (eg, Gradient Boosting and Random Forest) had the potential to provide high predictive performance based on the clinical parameters of each patient. The web application is available at www.hipprediction.com. External validation in a larger group of patients or in different hospital settings is warranted to evaluate the clinical utility of this tool. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (22 February 2021; reg. no. TCTR20210222003).en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and internal validation of a machine-learning-developed model for predicting 1-year mortality after fragility hip fractureen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleBMC Geriatricsen_US
article.volume22en_US
article.stream.affiliationsSiriraj Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.