Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74804
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChalermchai Ngamprasertkiten_US
dc.contributor.authorWeerapan Aunmeungthongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPathawee Khongkhunthianen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T06:50:33Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T06:50:33Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18651569en_US
dc.identifier.issn18651550en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85108646852en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10006-021-00975-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108646852&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74804-
dc.description.abstractBackground: To evaluate and compare accuracy in position and inclination of a single-tooth implant placement using tooth-supported surgical drill guide (SDG) and surgical drill guide with implant insertion guide (SDIG) in fully digital workflow. Materials and methods: Thirty partially single edentulous patients were recruited. After randomization, participants were divided into 2 groups equally. The first group underwent implant placement through SDG only, while the second group was subjected to SDIG. All procedure proceeded under a fully digital workflow as the combination of digital scanning from an intraoral scanner, 3D radiographic images from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), implant planning software, and a 3D manufacturing machine. A post-operative CBCT was performed to compare the deviations (7 parameters) between planned and actual implant positions. Results: The mean global deviations at the shoulder and apex were 0.74 ± 0.36 and 1.29 ± 0.61 mm, respectively in the SDG group and 0.48 ± 0.22 mm and 0.71 ± 0.31 mm, respectively in the SDIG group. Likewise, the other parameters in the SDIG group showed fewer deviations than SDG for all measurements. Statistically significant differences were indicated by all parameters except for the horizontal deviation at the implant shoulder (p <.05). Conclusion: In single-tooth implant placement with a tooth-supported guide using a computer-assisted (static) system with the SDIG could reduce deviations of actual implant position when compared with using SDG only. Besides, guided implant surgery by fully digital workflow is a practical procedure and provides precise implant position regarding the prosthetic-driven concept.en_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe implant position accuracy between using only surgical drill guide and surgical drill guide with implant guide in fully digital workflow: a randomized clinical trialen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleOral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
article.volume26en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.