Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73244
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPiranee Kaewbuten_US
dc.contributor.authorNatapong Kosachunhanunen_US
dc.contributor.authorArintaya Phrommintikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorDujrudee Chinwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn J. Hallen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurarong Chinwongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:37:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:37:26Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn16489144en_US
dc.identifier.issn1010660Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85122445259en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3390/medicina58010063en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122445259&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73244-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Clinical inertia is a key obstacle that leads to suboptimal care in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It can occur at any stage of T2DM treatment. However, the effect of clinical inertia on diabetes complications has not been studied sufficiently. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of clinical inertia on the risk of diabetes complications among patients with T2DM. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Thailand between 2011 and 2017. Outpatients with T2DM, aged 40–65 years, presenting an HbA1c greater than 7% were included in this study. Clinical inertia was identified when patients did not get treatment intensification at the index date and a subsequent prescription. The association between clinical inertia and diabetes complications, including a composite of macrovascular complications and a composite of microvascular complications, was determined using a Cox proportional hazard model. Propensity score methods were applied, to control confounding by indication. Results: Of 686 patients with T2DM, 165 (24.0%) experienced clinical inertia. Baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, body mass index, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and medication between the two groups did not differ significantly. Our study found that clinical inertia was associated with a significantly increased risk of diabetic nephropathy (adjusted HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.01–2.27). The results remained the same as when using propensity score methods. According to the post hoc analysis, lowering the HbA1c levels by 1% results in a significant decrease in the rate of diabetic complications (adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86–0.99), the composite of microvascular complications (adjusted HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.98) and diabetic nephropathy (adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80–0.98). Conclusions: Our results demonstrated a significant effect of clinical inertia on diabetic nephropathy. Patients with an HbA1c level over the target range should have their medication intensified to reduce the risk of diabetic nephropathy.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEffect of Clinical Inertia on Diabetes Complications among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleMedicina (Lithuania)en_US
article.volume58en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Phayaoen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUNSW Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.