Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73208
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhasawee Chiewhatpongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKittipat Charoenkwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorKannika Smithisethen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarangkana Lapisatepunen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanuwat Lapisatepunen_US
dc.contributor.authorMattabhorn Phimphilaien_US
dc.contributor.authorTanarat Muangmoolen_US
dc.contributor.authorChalong Cheewakriangkraien_US
dc.contributor.authorPrapaporn Supraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorJatupol Srisomboonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:37:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:37:00Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18793479en_US
dc.identifier.issn00207292en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85128539363en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1002/ijgo.14211en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128539363&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73208-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To examine the effectiveness of applying the recommended enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compared with our usual care in women with gynecologic malignancy undergoing elective laparotomy. Methods: From June 2020 to May 2021, 93 women with gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrium, and ovary) undergoing elective laparotomy at our institution were randomly assigned into an intervention group (ERAS protocol, 46 women) or control group (usual care, 47 women). For the intervention group, each woman was brought through the pre-specified ERAS protocol starting from preoperative counseling to postoperative management. For the control group, participants underwent routine standard care. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay and postoperative pain. Results: The intervention group demonstrated shorter hospital stay by 20 h (47.48 h vs 67.17 h, P = 0.02) with lower postoperative pain score at postoperative day 0 (1.58 vs 4.00, P < 0.01) and day 1 (1.00 vs 2.67, P < 0.01) while having decreased opioid consumption (P < 0.01). The intervention group also had faster recovery of gastrointestinal function. Overall, good compliance to most of the ERAS pathway domains was obtained. Conclusion: The ERAS protocol demonstrates benefits on shortening hospital stay, reducing pain, and bowel function recovery without increasing complications in our population. Clinical Trial Registration: The present study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04201626) on December 3, 2019. Initial participant enrollment began on June 1, 2020. Access through URL of the registration site: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04201626?cond=ERAS&cntry=TH&draw=2&rank=3.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in open gynecologic oncology surgery: A randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetricsen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.