Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72836
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yi Peng Xu | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Run Hao Liu | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Meng Zhuo Shen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zheng Ang Lv | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Supat Chupradit | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmed Sayed M. Metwally | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mika Sillanpaa | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Qian Qian | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-27T08:30:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-27T08:30:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 23525509 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85129961890 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129961890&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72836 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study aims to develop an economically viable novel process with high thermodynamic efficiency for the co-generation of methanol and electricity from coke oven gas (COG) and blast furnace gas (BFG). For this purpose, two processes are proposed to utilize COG and BFG. In process A, syngas is obtained from COG reforming, and BFG, after providing the required heat for the reformer, is injected into the methanol synthesis reactor as a rich carbon source. In process B, in addition to the above-mentioned, additional hydrogen is injected into the methanol reactor to enhance carbon dioxide conversion. The performance of the proposed systems is evaluated using energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, net CO2 emission, and total production cost. Results show that energy efficiencies for processes A and B are 53.53% and 72.8%, and their exergy efficiencies are 23% and 26%, respectively. Moreover, environmental analysis demonstrates that process B has a net CO2 emission of −1.82 kgCO2/kgmethanol, while for process A, this parameter is relatively higher, and it is positive. From the economic viewpoint, it is concluded that process B is more feasible, and the total production cost of methanol decreases by 87.62% compared to process A. Also, it can be deduced that in the case of utilizing additional hydrogen electricity and methanol production from COG and BFG is interesting from the thermodynamic and economic point of view, and due to negative net CO2 emission, it is environmentally desirable, too. | en_US |
dc.subject | Energy | en_US |
dc.subject | Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental Science | en_US |
dc.title | Assessment of methanol and electricity co-production plants based on coke oven gas and blast furnace gas utilization | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | Sustainable Production and Consumption | en_US |
article.volume | 32 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Tiangong University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Nanjing Audit University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Aarhus Universitet | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Kunming University of Science and Technology | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Central South University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | College of Sciences | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | University of Johannesburg | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.