Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72806
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWannakamon Panyaraken_US
dc.contributor.authorToru Chikuien_US
dc.contributor.authorKenji Tokumorien_US
dc.contributor.authorYasuo Yamashitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTakeshi Kamitanien_US
dc.contributor.authorOsamu Togaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorShintaro Kawanoen_US
dc.contributor.authorKazunori Yoshiuraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:30:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:30:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1476542Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn0250832Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85122403406en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1259/DMFR.20200609en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122403406&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72806-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the gamma distribution (GD), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and monoexponential (ME) models in terms of their goodness-of-fit, correlations among the parameters, and the effectiveness in the differential diagnosis of various orofacial lesions. Methods: A total of 85 patients underwent turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging with six b-values. The goodness-of-fit of three models was assessed using Akaike Information Criterion. We analysed the correlations and compared the effectiveness in the differential diagnosis among the parameters of GD model (κ, shape parameter; θ, scale parameter; fractions of diffusion: ƒ1, cellular component; ƒ2, extracellular diffusion; ƒ3, perfusion component), IVIM model (D, true diffusion coefficient; D*, pseudodiffusion coefficient; f, perfusion fraction), and ME model (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC). Results: The GD and IVIM models showed a better goodness-of-fit than the ME model (p < 0.05). ƒ1 had strong negative correlations with D and ADC (ρ = -0.901 and -0.937, respectively), while ƒ3 had a moderate positive correlation with f (ρ = 0.661). Malignant entity presented significantly higher ƒ1 and lower D and ADC than benign entity (p < 0.0001). Malignant lymphoma had significantly higher ƒ1 in comparison to squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.0007) and granulation (p = 0.0075). The trend in ƒ1 was opposite to the trend in D. Malignant lymphoma had significant lower ƒ3 than squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.005) or granulation (p = 0.0075). Conclusions: The strong correlations were found between the GD- and IVIM-derived parameters. Furthermore, the GD model's parameters were useful for characterising the pathological structure in orofacial lesions.en_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA comparison among gamma distribution, intravoxel incoherent motion, and mono-exponential models with turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of orofacial lesionsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleDentomaxillofacial Radiologyen_US
article.volume51en_US
article.stream.affiliationsGraduate School of Medical Sciencesen_US
article.stream.affiliationsKyushu University Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsKyushu Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsTeikyo Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.