Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72593
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeha R. Santuccien_US
dc.contributor.authorChristopher Kingen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhalil I. El-Chammasen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnundorn Wongteerasuten_US
dc.contributor.authorAlisara Damrongmaneeen_US
dc.contributor.authorKahleb Grahamen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin Feien_US
dc.contributor.authorRashmi Sahayen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheryl Jonesen_US
dc.contributor.authorNatoshia R. Cunninghamen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert C. Coghillen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:27:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:27:04Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn13652982en_US
dc.identifier.issn13501925en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85126326453en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1111/nmo.14358en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126326453&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72593-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) improves symptoms in adolescents with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs). However, little is known about its impact on sleep and psychological functioning. We evaluated the effects of PENFS on resting and evoked pain and nausea, sleep and psychological functioning, and long-term outcomes. Methods: Patient ages 11–19 years with FAPD requiring PENFS as standard care were recruited. Evoked pain was elicited by a Water Load Symptom Provocation Task (WL-SPT) before and after four weeks of treatment. Pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep, somatic symptoms, and physical and psychological functioning were assessed. Actigraphy was used to measure daily sleep–wake patterns. Key Results: Twenty patients (14.3 ± 2.2 years old) with FAPD were enrolled. Most patients were females (70%) and white (95%). During pain evoked by WL-SPT, visual analog scale (VAS) pain intensity and nausea were lower following PENFS compared with baseline (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02, respectively). After PENFS, resting VAS pain unpleasantness (p = 0.03), abdominal pain (p < 0.0001), pain catastrophizing (p = 0.0004), somatic complaints (0.01), functional disability (p = 0.04), and anxiety (p = 0.02) exhibited significant improvements, and some were sustained long-term. Self-reported sleep improved after PENFS (p's < 0.05) as well as actigraphy-derived sleep onset latency (p = 0.03). Conclusions and Inferences: We demonstrated improvements in resting and evoked pain and nausea, sleep, disability, pain catastrophizing, somatic complaints, and anxiety after four weeks of PENFS therapy. Some effects were sustained at 6–12 months post-treatment. This suggests that PENFS is a suitable alternative to pharmacologic therapy.en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.titleEffect of percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation on mechanosensitivity, sleep, and psychological comorbidities in adolescents with functional abdominal pain disordersen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleNeurogastroenterology and Motilityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsMichigan State Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Centeren_US
article.stream.affiliationsPhramongkutklao College of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.