Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71377
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRiccardo Di Gianfilippoen_US
dc.contributor.authorBenyapha Sirinirunden_US
dc.contributor.authorMaria Vera Rodriguezen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhaozhao Chenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHom Lay Wangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-27T03:42:02Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-27T03:42:02Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-02en_US
dc.identifier.issn20763417en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85097989908en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3390/app10249084en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097989908&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71377-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. A multitude of clinical trials have tested therapeutic approaches to treat peri-implantitis but there is still no consensus on what treatment modality leads to the most favorable clinical improvement and reduced implant loss. Therefore, the present systematic review reported on the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes after treatment of peri-implantitis with different surgical approaches. A PICO question was defined; manual and electronic searches were completed to screen for human prospective studies with at least 3 years of follow-up after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Analyses were performed using a random-effect model. Thirteen trials reported on 706 implants and 399 patients. Open flap, resective and reconstructive approaches led to a probing depth reduction of 2.23, 2.25 and 3.78 mm with a survival rate of 84%, 90% and 95%, respectively. Reconstructive treatments were followed by an average of 2.34 mm of radiographic bone gain, flap had negligible bone changes (0.11 mm) and resective approaches resulted in a mean bone loss of 0.5 mm. Large heterogeneity existed among studies for diagnostic criteria and decontamination modalities. Within the existing limitations, regenerative approaches for the treatment of peri-implantitis lead to advantageous long-term improvement of peri-implant tissues and higher implant survival rate.en_US
dc.subjectChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Scienceen_US
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleLong-term prognosis of peri-implantitis treatment: A systematic review of prospective trials with more than 3 years of follow-upen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleApplied Sciences (Switzerland)en_US
article.volume10en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arboren_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.