Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70904
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJiraporn Chittrakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPenprapa Sivirojen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomporn Sungkaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorRatana Sapbamreren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T08:44:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-14T08:44:27Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn20902212en_US
dc.identifier.issn20902204en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85088265404en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1155/2020/3964973en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088265404&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70904-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Jiraporn Chittrakul et al. Introduction. Frailty is a condition in older adults with decreased physical and cognitive performance that can affect health outcomes associated with fracture, disability, and falls. The aim of this study was to compare fall risk with different physical frailty statuses and investigate factors associated with fall risk in community-dwelling older adults. Methods. The population studied included 367 older adults (mean age = 73.2 years ± 7.0; 237 females (64.6%) and 130 males (35.4%)) who live in Chiang Mai, Thailand. This study was of cross-sectional design. Fried's phenotype was used to screen the physical frailty status. The physiological profile assessment (PPA) was used to screen for fall risk. One-way ANOVA analysis was used to compare the fall risk between the different levels of frailty status. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the association between frailty status and fall risk. Results. The prevalence of the frailty group was 8.7% and that of the prefrailty group was 76.8%. The three statuses of frailty identified were found to have different levels of risk of falling. The frailty group had a higher fall risk than the nonfrailty group and the prefrailty group. In addition, the nonfrailty group had a lower fall risk than the prefrailty group. Conclusion. The frailty group had the highest fall risk in this cohort of older adults living in a community-dwelling facility. Therefore, it is important to assess the frailty status among older adults as it can be a predictor for fall risk. This assessment will therefore lead to a reduction in the rate of disability and death in the community.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePhysical Frailty and Fall Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Aging Researchen_US
article.volume2020en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.