Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70845
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPathomporn Pin-Onen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrangmalee Leurcharusmeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuwannee Tanasungnuchiten_US
dc.contributor.authorKatekanog Srivitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorParichad Khunwittayaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T08:42:17Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-14T08:42:17Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18271596en_US
dc.identifier.issn03759393en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85087465754en_US
dc.identifier.other10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14202-0en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087465754&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70845-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA BACKGROUND: Compared to sevoflurane, desflurane is less favorable to most anesthesiologists for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) anesthesia because desflurane has a pungent odor. This non-inferiority study aimed to determine whether desflurane is not worse than sevoflurane in triggering airway irritations during general anesthesia using LMA. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective surgery under LMA anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either desflurane or sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia. After intravenous fentanyl, lidocaine and propofol administration followed by LMA insertion, 0.5-1.0 MAC of the volatile anesthetic in 50% N2O was maintained throughout the surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of perioperative adverse respiratory events. Other outcomes included recovery profiles, hemodynamic changes and postoperative complications. RESULTS: One-hundred and ten patients per group completed the study without any serious complications, lost to follow-up, or protocol deviation. During awake LMA removal, patients in the desflurane group experienced lesser episodes of laryngospasm (risk difference, -7.3%; 95% CI, -12.7% to -1.9%; P=0.009) than those in the sevoflurane group. The emergence time and time to LMA removal were significantly shorter in the desflurane group. The quality of recovery indicated by an ability to self-transfer from bed to bed was significantly better after desflurane anesthesia. No difference between groups was found in a return of orientation and a readiness for post-anesthesia care unit discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Desflurane is non-inferior to sevoflurane in the occurrence of laryngospasm at emergence after LMA anesthesia. The superiority of desflurane compared to sevoflurane with regards to respiratory complications requires further investigation.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDesflurane is not inferior to sevoflurane in the occurrence of adverse respiratory events during laryngeal mask airway anesthesia: A non-inferiority randomized double-blinded controlled studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleMinerva Anestesiologicaen_US
article.volume86en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.