Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70820
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorK. Rittiluechaien_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Sermsukcharoenchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Thiangthamen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Chanpanitkitchoten_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Hanprasertpongen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Charoenkwanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T08:42:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-14T08:42:00Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85089831019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089831019&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70820-
dc.description.abstract© Journal of The Medical Association of Thailand Objective: To assess current practice for the management of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) in Thailand. Material and Methods: Thai gynecologic oncologists who had been practicing in the field for at least one year were invited to complete an on-line self-administered questionnaire. The survey encompassed general aspect and organ-specific aspect of care including management of cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, and ovarian cancer. This study represents a part of the main study that addressed LACC management. Results: One hundred seventy gynecologic oncologists responded to the survey. Seventy-eight percent of the respondents treated the patients with bulky early-stage IB3 and IIA2 by concurrent chemoradiation, followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery (22.4%), and surgery alone (11.8%). Almost all of respondents preferred to use concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation for the patients with locally advanced stage IIB to IVA. Only 1.8% of them would consider other treatment modalities. The more effective treatment modalities have been identified in order to improve outcome and reduce toxicity of standard treatment. Large disparity was observed about controversial treatment issues, including ovarian transposition, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, surgical staging for lymph nodes assessment, adjuvant chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy. Conclusion: Most Thai gynecologic oncologists have been treating patients with LACC by mostly following standard guideline. However, there are variations in practice pattern in some controversial issues.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleManagement of locally advanced cervical cancer: Survey of practice among Thai gynecologic oncologistsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of the Medical Association of Thailanden_US
article.volume103en_US
article.stream.affiliationsRangsit Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsPhramongkutklao College of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.