Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70663
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEsaú C. Joãoen_US
dc.contributor.authorR. Leavitt Morrisonen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid E. Shapiroen_US
dc.contributor.authorNahida Chakhtouraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaria Isabel S. Gouvèaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaria de Lourdes B Teixeiraen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrevon L. Fulleren_US
dc.contributor.authorBlandina T. Mmbagaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames S. Ngochoen_US
dc.contributor.authorBoniface N. Njauen_US
dc.contributor.authorAvy Violarien_US
dc.contributor.authorRuth Mathibaen_US
dc.contributor.authorZaynab Essacken_US
dc.contributor.authorJose Henrique S. Pilottoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLuis Felipe Moreiraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaria Jose Rolonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPedro Cahnen_US
dc.contributor.authorSinart Prommasen_US
dc.contributor.authorTimothy R. Cresseyen_US
dc.contributor.authorKulkanya Chokephaibulkiten_US
dc.contributor.authorPeerawong Weraraken_US
dc.contributor.authorLauren Laimonen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoslyn Hennessyen_US
dc.contributor.authorLisa M. Frenkelen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatricia Anthonyen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrookie M. Besten_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorge K. Siberryen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark Mirochnicken_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T08:37:26Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-14T08:37:26Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn23523018en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85084203155en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30038-2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084203155&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70663-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Elsevier Ltd Background: Although antiretroviral regimens containing integrase inhibitors rapidly suppress HIV viral load in non-pregnant adults, few published data from randomised controlled trials have compared the safety and efficacy of any integrase inhibitor to efavirenz when initiated during pregnancy. We compared safety and efficacy of antiretroviral therapy with either raltegravir or efavirenz in late pregnancy. Methods: An open-label, randomised controlled trial was done at 19 hospitals and clinics in Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, and the USA. Antiretroviral-naive pregnant women (20–<37 weeks gestation) living with HIV were assigned to antiretroviral regimens containing either raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) or efavirenz (600 mg each night) plus lamivudine 150 mg and zidovudine 300 mg twice daily (or approved alternative backbone regimen), using a web-based, permuted-block randomisation stratified by gestational age and backbone regimen. The primary efficacy outcome was plasma HIV viral load below 200 copies per mL at (or near) delivery. The primary efficacy analysis included all women with a viral load measurement at (or near) delivery who had viral load of at least 200 copies per mL before treatment and no genotypic resistance to any study drugs; secondary analyses eliminated these exclusion criteria. The primary safety analyses included all women who received study drug, and their infants. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01618305. Findings: From Sep 5, 2013, to Dec 11, 2018, 408 women were enrolled (206 raltegravir, 202 efavirenz) and 394 delivered on-study (200 raltegravir, 194 efavirenz); 307 were included in the primary efficacy analysis (153 raltegravir, 154 efavirenz). 144 (94%) women in the raltegravir group and 129 (84%) in the efavirenz group met the primary efficacy outcome (absolute difference 10%, 95% CI 3–18; p=0·0015); the difference primarily occurred among women enrolling later in pregnancy (interaction p=0·040). Frequencies of severe or life-threatening adverse events were similar among mothers (30% in each group; 61 raltegravir, 59 efavirenz) and infants (25% in each group; 50 raltegravir, 48 efavirenz), with no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation: Our findings support major guidelines. The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is currently a preferred regimen for the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission with raltegravir recommended as a preferred or alternative integrase inhibitor for pregnant women living with HIV. Funding: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.en_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRaltegravir versus efavirenz in antiretroviral-naive pregnant women living with HIV (NICHD P1081): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 4 trialen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleThe Lancet HIVen_US
article.volume7en_US
article.stream.affiliationsSeattle Children's Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsKilimanjaro Christian Medical Collegeen_US
article.stream.affiliationsWestat, Inc.en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of California, San Diegoen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Southern Californiaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFundacion Huespeden_US
article.stream.affiliationsFundacao Oswaldo Cruzen_US
article.stream.affiliationsBhumibol Adulyadej Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Witwatersranden_US
article.stream.affiliationsUnited States Agency for International Developmenten_US
article.stream.affiliationsBoston University School of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsCenter for Biostatistics in AIDS Researchen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsHospital Geral de Nova Iguaçuen_US
article.stream.affiliationsHospital Federal dos Servidores do Estadoen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.