Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70542
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXinyu Yuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJiechen Tangen_US
dc.contributor.authorWing Keung Wongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSongsak Sriboonchittaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T08:33:19Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-14T08:33:19Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn20711050en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85083898402en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3390/SU12010393en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85083898402&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70542-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 by the authors. The aim of this research is to explore the volatility contagion among different agricultural commodity markets. For this purpose, this research make use of the copula-GARCH (Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity) model for the daily spot prices of six major agriculture grain commodities including corn, wheat, soybeans, soya oil, cotton, and oat over the period from 2000 to 2019. Our results provide evidence that significant contagion effects and risk transmissions exist among different agricultural grain commodity markets, suggesting that potential speculation effects on one agricultural market could be contagious for another agricultural market and result an increase in volatility in agricultural product markets. Second, agricultural commodities appears to co-move symmetrically. We also find substantial extreme co-movements among agricultural commodity markets. This indicates that agricultural commodity markets tend to crash (boom) together during extreme events. Moreover, after the food crisis, contagion effects and risk transmissions among different agricultural commodity markets increased substantially. Fourth, we find that the strongest contagion effects and risk transmissions are between corn and soybeans, and the weakest contagion effects and risk transmissions are between soya oil cotton and between cotton and oat. Last, we document that the co-movement varies over time. Our findings hold important implications for modeling the co-movement by the copula-GARCH approach.en_US
dc.subjectEnergyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleModeling co-movement among different agricultural commodity markets: A copula-GARCH approachen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleSustainability (Switzerland)en_US
article.volume12en_US
article.stream.affiliationsAsia University Taiwanen_US
article.stream.affiliationsKunming University of Science and Technologyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsYunnan Normal Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.