Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68653
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuttanachai Suttipunen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeerawan Siripongen_US
dc.contributor.authorOn-anong Sattayaraken_US
dc.contributor.authorJittima Wichianraken_US
dc.contributor.authorSutira Limroscharoenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-20T04:41:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-20T04:41:50Z-
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.citationASR: Chiang Mai University.Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 5,1 (Jan- 2018), p.33-53en_US
dc.identifier.issn2465-4329en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuj.cmu.ac.th/uploads/asr_journal_list_index/300881144.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68653-
dc.descriptionASR (Asian Social Research) was first launched in 2014 by Chiang Mai University. However, it has a longer history, with its genesis in 2002 as part of Chiang Mai University Journal.This journal was split into two in 2007, with the formation of ASR's predecessor, the Chiang Mai University Journal of social Sciences and Humanities, which was later restyled as ASR in 2014, and began publishing online in 2015.en_US
dc.description.abstractEven though enterprise risk management (ERM) has been extensively studied in recent years, the influence of ERM on firm performance in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and its benefits to them has been little studied in emerging countries. Therefore, the main objectives of the study reported were to (1) investigate the extent and level of ERM among SMEs in southern Thailand, and (2) test for the influence of ERM on firm performance measured by the balanced scorecard (BSC) of SMEs. Using a mailed questionnaire, a sample of 385 (out of 394) SMEs from southern Thailand were analyzed. Descriptive analysis, a correlation matrix, and multiple regression were used to analyze the data obtained. From the results, the most common element of ERM employed was information and communication followed by control activities, monitoring, risk response, internal environment, event identification, objective setting, and risk assessment. Moreover, objective setting, risk assessment, control activities, and monitoring were found to significantly and positively influence SMEs’ performance measured by BSC while event identification had a negative influence on SMEs’ performance. The study demonstrates that SMEs in developing countries can benefit from the adoption of ERM in the same way as large firms in developed countries.en_US
dc.language.isoEngen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.subjectEnterprise risk managementen_US
dc.subjectFirm performanceen_US
dc.subjectBalanced scorecarden_US
dc.subjectSMEsen_US
dc.subjectSouthern Thailanden_US
dc.titleThe Influence of Enterprise Risk Management on Firm Performance Measured by the Balanced Scorecard: Evidence from SMEs in Southern Thailanden_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.