Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68546
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoherndran Archaryen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrian Zanonien_US
dc.contributor.authorMarc Lallemanten_US
dc.contributor.authorPuckwipa Suwannapromen_US
dc.contributor.authorDiana Clarkeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartina Penazzatoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T15:29:06Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-02T15:29:06Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15320987en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85076277271en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1097/INF.0000000000002539en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076277271&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68546-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Raltegravir granules for oral suspension, now recommended by World Health Organization for use in neonates with HIV infection, may be challenging for caregivers because of the multistep preparation required. METHODS: We evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of preparing granules for oral suspension in a low-to-middle-income country setting. Thirty-four caregivers and 10 health-care workers were enrolled from an HIV clinic in Durban, South Africa. Health-care workers were provided with pictorial instruction booklet, demonstration kit and guidance on preparation of granules for oral suspension. The health-care workers then trained caregivers on the preparation of granules for oral suspension. Caregivers were evaluated during the preparation process and instructed to practice at home with a sample kit and return to the clinic for repeat evaluation 5-7 days later. Caregivers and health-care workers were interviewed and participated in a focus group discussion regarding their experiences. RESULTS: The median age of the caregivers was 31 years (interquartile range: 9.7); 70% had received secondary-level education, 37% were employed. The median preparation time was 7.95 minutes (interquartile range: 5.08 minutes) and 7.48 minutes (3.55 minutes) at initial and repeated observation, respectively. Major errors were insufficient mixing time and incorrect suspension volume. The average number of errors between the 2 observation time points was significantly reduced at the repeat session (2.5 vs. 0.87, P = 0.023). Most participants found the preparation difficult at first but gained confidence over time. CONCLUSION: Despite the complexity involved in the preparation of the granules for oral suspension, with practice, this formulation was found to be acceptable and feasible to majority of participants in this low-resource setting. As a result, this formulation was included in the 2018 World Health Organization recommendations for first line in neonates living with HIV.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAcceptability and Feasibility of Using Raltegravir Oral Granules for the Treatment of Neonates in a Low-resource Settingen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleThe Pediatric infectious disease journalen_US
article.volume39en_US
article.stream.affiliationsHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Healthen_US
article.stream.affiliationsMassachusetts General Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsOrganisation Mondiale de la Santéen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of KwaZulu-Natalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsBoston Medical Centeren_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.