Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68419
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLouis Lebelen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrea Haefneren_US
dc.contributor.authorClaudia Pahl-Wostlen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnik Badurien_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T15:26:43Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-02T15:26:43Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18624057en_US
dc.identifier.issn18624065en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85078352831en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s11625-019-00779-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078352831&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68419-
dc.description.abstract© 2020, Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature. The social relations and biophysical flows that link water, food, and energy systems are said to form a ‘nexus’. Efforts to steer or otherwise exert influence on decisions that impact upon these nexus links, including to ignore them, take place at multiple levels, vary in complexity, and have implications for who benefits and who is burdened by those relations and flows. This paper examines how nexus links have been governed, using four medium- to large-scale water infrastructure projects in Laos and Thailand as probes into problematic issues of coordination, anticipation, inclusion, and attribution. Project documents, media reports, and published analyses were coded to extract information about nexus links, narratives, and decisions. Nexus interactions were summarized using a novel symbolic notation and then classified along a scale of increasing structural complexity as pairs, chains, and loops. The key finding from the analysis of the four projects was that nexus governance was fragmented, reactive, exclusive, and opaque. Coordination among ministries was limited with inter-ministerial bodies, and integrated development plans ineffective at guiding project design or operation decisions in the presence of bureaucratic competition. Anticipation of cross-sectoral concerns was rare, despite scope to identify them early in feasibility studies, and assessment activities; instead they were only acknowledged after public pressure. Inclusion of the needs of vulnerable and affected groups was limited, although poverty alleviation, and other social benefits were a significant element in project justification narratives. Attribution of responsibility was difficult as many key decisions took place behind closed doors, while project information was withheld, raising further governance issues of transparency and accountability. Structural complexity in the nexus links made addressing governance problems even more challenging.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleGovernance of the water-energy-food nexus: insights from four infrastructure projects in the Lower Mekong Basinen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleSustainability Scienceen_US
article.stream.affiliationsGriffith Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversität Osnabrücken_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.