Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67943
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChanane Wanapiraken_US
dc.contributor.authorWirawit Piyamongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupatra Sirichotiyakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorFuanglada Tongpraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorKasemsri Srisupunditen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuchaya Luewanen_US
dc.contributor.authorKuntharee Traisrisilpen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhudit Jatavanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTheera Tongsongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T15:12:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-02T15:12:05Z-
dc.date.issued2019-11-27en_US
dc.identifier.issn14726963en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85075761104en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12913-019-4446-xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075761104&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67943-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Author(s). Background: To identify the performance of fetal Down syndrome (DS) screening for developing countries. Methods: A prospective study on MSS (maternal serum screening) with complete follow-ups (n = 41,924) was conducted in 32 network hospitals in the northern part of Thailand. Various models of MSS were tested for performance. Results: MSS based on Caucasian reference range resulted in very high false positive rate (FPR; 13%) in our country, compared to the rate of 7.8% with our own (Thai) reference range, whereas the detection rate was comparable. As individual screening, C-S (contingent first trimester screening including PAPP-A, and free beta-hCG, classified as a) high risk [> 1:30], indicated for invasive diagnosis; b) intermediate risk [1:30-1500], indicated for STS; and c) low risk [< 1:1500], need no further tests.) was the most effective model (sensitivity 84.9%, FPR 7.7%) but nearly one-third needed the second trimester test (STS) because of intermediate results. Additionally, about one-third had their first visits in the second trimester and had no chance of FTS (first trimester screening). C-S plus STS had a sensitivity of 82.4% and FPR 8.1% whereas independent first and second trimester screening model (I-S) gave the sensitivity of 78.4% and FPR of 7.5% but was much more convenient and practical. Conclusion: C-S plus STS was the most effective models while I-S model was also effective and may be better for developing countries because of its simplicity and feasibility.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleFetal Down syndrome screening models for developing countries; Part I: Performance of Maternal Serum Screeningen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleBMC Health Services Researchen_US
article.volume19en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.