Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67824
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNiti Kammuang-Lueen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirawat Boonjunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T15:05:09Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-02T15:05:09Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-01en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85074866693en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1109/ICMAE.2019.8880940en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074866693&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67824-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 IEEE. The objective of this study is to simulate and compare the energy consumption between electric and diesel rubber-tire buses suitable for operating in Chiang Mai, Thailand. The dynamic vehicle model together with the velocity and road gradient profiles measured along the real selected road in Chiang Mai were simulated following the backward-facing scheme to find the power of electric motor and diesel engine for the electric bus and diesel bus, respectively. For the electric bus, energy consumption per route, energy consumption per distance, and electricity price were calculated. In a case of the diesel bus, the theoretical diesel cycle model was additionally considered following the forward-facing scheme to determine the diesel consumption and then it was finally converted into energy consumption per route, energy consumption per distance, and diesel price. The simulated results showed that the total energy consumption and energy consumption rate of the electric bus equaled to 10.004 kWh/route and 1.112 kWh/km, respectively. These values were economically equivalent to be 1.250 USD/route and 0.139 USD/km, respectively. For a case of the diesel bus, the total energy consumption and energy consumption rate were 17.256 kWh/route and 1.917 kWh/km, respectively, in turn, they were 1.543 USD/route and 0.171 USD/km, respectively in economic point of view. Finally, the electrical bus has significantly lower energy consumption and lower cost than the diesel bus for 42% and 19%, respectively.en_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.titleSimulation and comparison on energy consumption between electric and diesel buses: Feasibility study on electric rubber-tire bus potential in Chiang Maien_US
dc.typeConference Proceedingen_US
article.title.sourcetitle2019 IEEE 10th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, ICMAE 2019en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.