Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67604
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRomanee Chaiwarithen_US
dc.contributor.authorJutarat Praparattanapanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilai Kotarathititumen_US
dc.contributor.authorJiraprapa Wipasaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanokporn Chaiklangen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhuanchai Supparatpinyoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T14:56:31Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-02T14:56:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-11-11en_US
dc.identifier.issn17426405en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85074851471en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12981-019-0249-8en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074851471&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67604-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Author(s). Background: We previously reported that four doses or four double doses of hepatitis B vaccination regimens could not significantly increase a response rate compared with standard doses. However, the antibody levels were higher in the four doses and four double doses groups. This study followed those patients for at least 3 years and aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of the three vaccination regimens. Methods: HIV-infected adults who had CD4+ cell counts > 200 cells/mm3, undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA, and negative for all hepatitis B virus markers were randomly assigned to receive one of three recombinant vaccines (Hepavax-Gene® Berna, Korea) regimens: 20 μg IM at months 0, 1, and 6 (standard doses group, n = 44), 20 μg IM at months 0, 1, 2, 6 (four doses group, n = 44), or 40 μg IM at months 0, 1, 2, and 6 (four double doses group, n = 44) between February 2011 and May 4, 2012. Of 132 participants, 126 were evaluated from August 2015 to January 2016; 42 in the standard doses, 43 in the four doses, and 41 in the four double doses groups. Results: At a median duration of 49.7 months (range 46.7-53.7) after completion of the primary vaccination schedule, the percentages of responders with anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL were 57.1% (95% CI 41.5-72.8%) in the standard doses group; 76.7% (95% CI 63.6-89.9%) in the four doses group (P = 0.067 vs. the standard doses group); and 80.5% (95% CI 67.8-93.2%) in the four double doses group (P = 0.033 vs. the standard doses group). Factors associated with a responder were the vaccination schedule (either four doses or four double doses groups) and a younger age. Conclusions: Despite the highly effectiveness of the standard hepatitis B vaccination regimen at 6 months after completion, the long-term immunogenicity was lower than the four double doses regimen among HIV-infected adults with CD4+ cell counts > 200 cells/mm3 and undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA. The standard vaccination regimen may not be the best strategy to provide long-term immune response against hepatitis B virus among HIV-infected individuals. Trial registration NCT1289106, NCT02713620en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleHigher rate of long-term serologic response of four double doses vs. standard doses of hepatitis B vaccination in HIV-infected adults: 4-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleAIDS Research and Therapyen_US
article.volume16en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.