Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67575
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Patorn Piromchai | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Charoiboon Puvatanond | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Virat Kirtsreesakul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Saisawat Chaiyasate | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sanguansak Thanaviratananich | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-02T14:55:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-02T14:55:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 21678359 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85074192596 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.7717/peerj.7000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074192596&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67575 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2019 PeerJ Inc.. All rights reserved. Background. Nasal irrigation is widely used as an adjunctive treatment for nasal diseases. There is little evidence regarding the efficacy of the devices used in this procedure. The objective of this survey was to evaluate the effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices based on the experiences of patients and physicians. Methods. We conducted a multicentre survey study between November 2017 and October 2018. Physician and patient questionnaires were developed based on the available literature and expert opinion. The physician questionnaire was submitted to the Otolaryngology residents and staff of each centre and their network. The physicians were also asked to distribute the patient questionnaire to their patients. Results. Information regarding 331 devices used by the patients was collected. The mean age of the patients was 45.46 17.19 years (from 5 to 81). Roughly half were male, and half were female (48.6%: 51.4%). Among the high-pressure devices, we found that the high-pressure large-volume nasal irrigation devices yielded significantly higher symptom scores in seven of 12 domains (p 0:05). Among the large-volume devices, we found that the large-volume high-pressure nasal irrigation devices received significantly higher symptom scores in 4 of 12 domains (p 0:05). However, a higher proportion of patients using the large-volume high-pressure devices had retained fluid in the sinuses compared to those using large-volume low-pressure devices (p 0:001). Conclusions. This survey supports the regular use of nasal irrigation, particularly with large-volume high-pressure devices, as an effective treatment for nasal disease. It may be effective at clearing nasal secretion, improve nasal congestion, decrease post-nasal drip, improve sinus pain or headache, improve taste and smell, and improve sleep quality. It could be used by patients with good compliance and minimal side effects. | en_US |
dc.subject | Agricultural and Biological Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject | Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | en_US |
dc.subject | Neuroscience | en_US |
dc.title | Effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: A Thai multicentre survey | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | PeerJ | en_US |
article.volume | 2019 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Prince of Songkla University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.