Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67575
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatorn Piromchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorCharoiboon Puvatanonden_US
dc.contributor.authorVirat Kirtsreesakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaisawat Chaiyasateen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanguansak Thanaviratananichen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T14:55:52Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-02T14:55:52Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn21678359en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85074192596en_US
dc.identifier.other10.7717/peerj.7000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074192596&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67575-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 PeerJ Inc.. All rights reserved. Background. Nasal irrigation is widely used as an adjunctive treatment for nasal diseases. There is little evidence regarding the efficacy of the devices used in this procedure. The objective of this survey was to evaluate the effectiveness of nasal irrigation devices based on the experiences of patients and physicians. Methods. We conducted a multicentre survey study between November 2017 and October 2018. Physician and patient questionnaires were developed based on the available literature and expert opinion. The physician questionnaire was submitted to the Otolaryngology residents and staff of each centre and their network. The physicians were also asked to distribute the patient questionnaire to their patients. Results. Information regarding 331 devices used by the patients was collected. The mean age of the patients was 45.46 17.19 years (from 5 to 81). Roughly half were male, and half were female (48.6%: 51.4%). Among the high-pressure devices, we found that the high-pressure large-volume nasal irrigation devices yielded significantly higher symptom scores in seven of 12 domains (p 0:05). Among the large-volume devices, we found that the large-volume high-pressure nasal irrigation devices received significantly higher symptom scores in 4 of 12 domains (p 0:05). However, a higher proportion of patients using the large-volume high-pressure devices had retained fluid in the sinuses compared to those using large-volume low-pressure devices (p 0:001). Conclusions. This survey supports the regular use of nasal irrigation, particularly with large-volume high-pressure devices, as an effective treatment for nasal disease. It may be effective at clearing nasal secretion, improve nasal congestion, decrease post-nasal drip, improve sinus pain or headache, improve taste and smell, and improve sleep quality. It could be used by patients with good compliance and minimal side effects.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of nasal irrigation devices: A Thai multicentre surveyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitlePeerJen_US
article.volume2019en_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.