Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67509
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tira Foran | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | David J. Penton | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tarek Ketelsen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Emily J. Barbour | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nicola Grigg | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Maheswor Shrestha | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Louis Lebel | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hemant Ojha | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Auro Almeida | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Neil Lazarow | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-02T14:53:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-02T14:53:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-12-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 20734441 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85076688427 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.3390/w11122480 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076688427&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/67509 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2019 by the authors. We reflect on methodologies to support integrated river basin planning for the Ayeyarwady Basin in Myanmar, and the Kamala Basin in Nepal, to which we contributed from 2017 to 2019. The principles of Integrated Water Resources Management have been promoted across states and regions with markedly different biophysical and political economic conditions. IWRM-based river basin planning is complex, resource intensive, and aspirational. It deserves scrutiny to improve process and outcome legitimacy. We focus on the value of co-production and deliberation in IWRM. Among our findings: (i) multi-stakeholder participation can be complicated by competition between actors for resources and legitimacy; (ii) despite such challenges, multi-stakeholder deliberative approaches can empower actors and can be an effective means for co-producing knowledge; (iii) tensions between (rational choice and co-productive) models of decision complicate participatory deliberative planning. Our experience suggests that a commitment to co-productive decision-making fosters socially legitimate IWRM outcomes. | en_US |
dc.subject | Agricultural and Biological Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject | Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental Science | en_US |
dc.subject | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.title | Planning in democratizing river basins: The case for a co-productive model of decision making | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | Water (Switzerland) | en_US |
article.volume | 11 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | CSIRO Land and Water | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | AMPERES | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Institute for Studies and Development Worldwide (IFSD) | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Water and Energy Commission Secretariat | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.