Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66174
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNurin Durehen_US
dc.contributor.authorChamnien Choonpraduben_US
dc.contributor.authorPhattrawan Tongkumchumen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-21T09:18:23Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-21T09:18:23Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationChiang Mai Journal of Science 42, 4 (Oct 2015), 1031 - 1037en_US
dc.identifier.issn0125-2526en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://it.science.cmu.ac.th/ejournal/dl.php?journal_id=6258en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66174-
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the tests for association in two by two tables with zero cell counts. Pearson’s uncorrected chi-squared test, Pearson’s chi-squared test with the continuity correction, Pearson’s uncorrected chi-squared Monte Carlo simulation test, Fisher’s exact test, the Conditional Binomial Exact Test (CBET), Barnard’s exact test, Liebermeister’s test, Lancaster’s mid P-test and logistic regression with penalized maximum likelihood were considered. Criteria used 72 two by two tables with smallest counts and average p-value for Fisher’s exact test and Pearson’s uncorrected chi-squared test close to 0.05. CBET, Lancaster’s test, and the penalized maximum likelihood test give similar p-values closest to 0.05, suggesting that these three methods can be recommended for testing association in two by two tables with zero cell counts.en_US
dc.language.isoEngen_US
dc.publisherScience Faculty of Chiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.subjectzero cellen_US
dc.subjecttwo by two tableen_US
dc.subjectassociationen_US
dc.titleComparing Tests for Association in Two- by-Two Tables with Zero Cell Countsen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.