Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/65641
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavid R. Howellen_US
dc.contributor.authorVipul Lugadeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMikhail Taksiren_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliam P. Meehanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-05T04:38:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-05T04:38:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn23263660en_US
dc.identifier.issn00913847en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85068172181en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1080/00913847.2019.1632155en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068172181&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/65641-
dc.description.abstract© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Objectives: Our was objectives were to (1) assess the validity of a smartphone-based application to obtain spatiotemporal gait variables relative to an established movement monitoring system used previously to evaluate post-concussion gait, and (2) determine the test-retest reliability of gait variables obtained with a smartphone. Methods: Twenty healthy participants (n = 14 females, mean age = 22.2, SD = 2.1 years) were assessed at two time points, approximately two weeks apart. Two measurement systems (inertial sensor system, smartphone application) acquired and analyzed single-task and dual-task spatio-temporal gait variables simultaneously. Our primary outcome measures were average walking speed (m/s), cadence (steps/min), and stride length (m) measured by the inertial sensor system and smartphone application. Results: Correlations between the systems were high to very high (Pearson r = 0.77–0.98) at both time points, with the exception of dual-task stride length at time 2 (Pearson r = 0.55). Bland-Altman analysis for average gait speed and cadence indicated the average disagreement between systems was close to zero, suggesting little evidence for systematic bias between acquisition systems. Test-retest consistency measures using the smartphone revealed high to very high reliability for all measurements (ICC = 0.81–0.95). Conclusions: Our results indicate that sensors within a smartphone are capable of measuring spatio-temporal gait variables similar to a validated three-sensor inertial sensor system in single-task and dual-task conditions, and that data are reliable across a two-week time interval. A smartphone-based application might allow clinicians to objectively evaluate gait in the management of concussion with high ease-of-use and a relatively low financial burden.en_US
dc.subjectHealth Professionsen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDetermining the utility of a smartphone-based gait evaluation for possible use in concussion managementen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitlePhysician and Sportsmedicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChildren's Hospital Bostonen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Colorado School of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsHarvard Medical Schoolen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsControl One LLCen_US
article.stream.affiliationsMicheli Center for Sports Injury Preventionen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChildrens Hospitalen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.