Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/65365
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKarn Wejaphikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorStefan Groenewegen_US
dc.contributor.authorYvonne Hilhorst-Hofsteeen_US
dc.contributor.authorV. Krishna Chatterjeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobin P. Peetersen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcel E. Meimaen_US
dc.contributor.authorW. Edward Visseren_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-05T04:32:14Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-05T04:32:14Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-19en_US
dc.identifier.issn19457197en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021972Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85066479373en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1210/jc.2018-02794en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066479373&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/65365-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Endocrine Society. Context The two major forms of circulating thyroid hormones (THs) are T3 and T4. T3 is regarded as the biologically active hormone because it binds to TH receptors (TRs) with greater affinity than T4. However, it is currently unclear what structural mechanisms underlie this difference in affinity. Objective Prompted by the identification of a novel M256T mutation in a resistance to TH (RTH)α patient, we investigated Met256 in TRα1 and the corresponding residue (Met310) in TRβ1, residues previously predicted by crystallographic studies in discrimination of T3 vs T4. Methods Clinical characterization of the RTHα patient and molecular studies (in silico protein modeling, radioligand binding, transactivation, and receptor-cofactor studies) were performed. Results Structural modeling of the TRα1-M256T mutant showed that distortion of the hydrophobic niche to accommodate the outer ring of ligand was more pronounced for T3 than T4, suggesting that this substitution has little impact on the affinity for T4. In agreement with the model, TRα1-M256T selectively reduced the affinity for T3. Also, unlike other naturally occurring TRα mutations, TRα1-M256T had a differential impact on T3- vs T4-dependent transcriptional activation. TRα1-M256A and TRβ1-M310T mutants exhibited similar discordance for T3 vs T4. Conclusions Met256-TRα1/Met310-TRβ1 strongly potentiates the affinity of TRs for T3, thereby largely determining that T3 is the bioactive hormone rather than T4. These observations provide insight into the molecular basis for underlying the different affinity of TRs for T3 vs T4, delineating a fundamental principle of TH signaling.en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleInsight into Molecular Determinants of T3 vs T4 Recognition from Mutations in Thyroid Hormone Receptor α and βen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolismen_US
article.volume104en_US
article.stream.affiliationsErasmus University Medical Centeren_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Cambridgeen_US
article.stream.affiliationsLeiden University Medical Center - LUMCen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.