Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62838
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorC. Jiamtonen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Ratreprasatsuken_US
dc.contributor.authorR. Jarayabhanden_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Kritsaneephaiboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Apivatthakakulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T07:54:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-29T07:54:18Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn10982353en_US
dc.identifier.issn08973806en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85056849435en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1002/ca.23220en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056849435&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62838-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of applying MIPO of the humerus via the posterior approach and to observe the tension of the radial nerve in different elbow positions. Two separate incisions were made on the posterior aspect of the humerus in ten fresh cadavers (20 humeri). The radial nerve was identified at the proximal incision and the distances through which the nerve could be elevated from the bone with the elbow in flexion and extension were measured. A 10-hole extra-articular distal humeral locking compression plate was inserted and fixed through the submuscular tunnel. The tunnel was then explored to identify any entrapment of the radial nerve and to observe the anatomical relationship of the radial nerve to the plate and bone. There was no entrapment of the radial nerve or its branches. The distances through which the radial nerve could be elevated were greater with the elbow in extension than in flexion (P < 0.01). The radial nerve crossed the medial and lateral borders of the posterior surface of the humerus at 80.1–132 mm (average 104.7 mm) and 116.6–175.5 mm (average 142.7 mm) of its total length, respectively. The axillary nerve was located at 38.7–61.7 mm (average 47.9 mm) of total humeral length. MIPO of the humerus using the posterior approach is an alternative option for treating distal humeral shaft fracture. The risk of radial nerve injury can be minimized by careful dissection in the proximal incision. Clin. Anat., 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe safety and feasibility of minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the posterior aspect of the humerus: A cadaveric studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleClinical Anatomyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsLerdsin Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsBhumibol Adulyadej Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.