Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62789
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKanit Sananpanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirachart Kraisarinen_US
dc.contributor.authorWuttipong Siriwittayakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorSiam Tongpraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorSongkiet Suwansirikulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T07:50:16Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-29T07:50:16Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15316564en_US
dc.identifier.issn03635023en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85053790304en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.07.013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053790304&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62789-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Purpose: To explore the feasibility of restoring all finger flexion after a cervical spinal cord injury. Methods: Double nerve transfer was conducted in 22 cadaver upper extremities. Donor nerves were the brachialis branch of the musculocutaneous nerve and the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) branches of the radial nerve. Recipient nerves were the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) and the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) branch of ulnar nerve (ulnar-FDP). Nerve transfers were evaluated on 3 parameters: surgical feasibility, donor-to-recipient axon count ratio, and distance from the coaptation site to the muscle entry of recipient nerve. A complete C6 spinal cord injury reconstruction was accomplished in a patient using a double nerve transfer of ECRB to ulnar-FDP and brachialis to AIN. Results: In the cadaver study, nerve transfers from ECRB to AIN, brachialis to AIN, and ECRB to ulnar-FDP were all feasible. The transfer from the brachialis to ulnar-FDP was not possible. Mean myelinated axon counts of AIN, brachialis, ulnar-FDP, and ECRB were 2,903 ± 1049, 1,497 ± 606, 753 ± 364, and 567 ± 175, respectively. The donor-to-recipient axon count ratios of ECRB to AIN, brachialis to AIN, and ECRB to ulnar-FDP were 0.24 ± 0.15, 0.55 ± 0.38, and 0.98 ± 0.60, respectively. The distance from coaptation of the ECRB to the ulnar-FDP muscle entry was shorter than for the other nerve transfers (54 ± 14.29 mm). At 18 months, there was restoration of flexion in all fingers and functional improvement from double nerve transfer of the brachialis to the AIN and the ECRB to the ulnar-FDP. Conclusions: Restoration of all finger flexion may be feasible by the ECRB to ulnar-FDP and brachialis to AIN double nerve transfer. Clinical relevance: Double nerve transfer can be used in C6-C7 spinal cord injury and patients with lower arm–type brachial plexus injury who have no finger flexion but have good brachialis and ECRB.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDouble Motor Nerve Transfer for All Finger Flexion in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: An Anatomical Study and a Clinical Reporten_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Hand Surgeryen_US
article.volume43en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.