Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62559
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArisa Parameyongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirinun Boripuntakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorTeerawat Kamnardsirien_US
dc.contributor.authorJitapa Chawawisuttikoolen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T07:32:25Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-29T07:32:25Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18792219en_US
dc.identifier.issn09666362en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85053327204en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.09.004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053327204&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62559-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Elsevier B.V. Background: The Swaymeter is a simple devicefor measuring postural sway. It consists of a 40-cm-long rod with a vertically mounted pen at the end of the rod that measures the displacement of the body at waist level. Research question: This device could be an effective tool for measuring postural sway in children. However, the validity and reliability of the Swaymeter in children has not been evaluated. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Swaymeter in typically developing children aged 7–12 years. Method: The Swaymeter procedure was randomly measured in quiet bipedal stance under 4 conditions: eyes open and eyes closed on the floor, eyes open and eyes closed on foam, 30 s were performed in each condition. There were 15 children participated in the validity study. The postural sway was measured concurrently with the motion capture system with two reflective markers on the top of the pen and 12ththoracic vertebra level in three trials with four testing conditions. Additionally, 36 children participated in test-retest reliability. Three measurements were performed on the same day and one week later. Results: Swaymeter had a moderate to good correlation with motion capture system (r = 0.637–0.979). The test-retest reliability of the Swaymeter showed moderate to good reliability for immediate test-retest (ICC = 0.51–0.87). However, inter-session reliability revealed moderate to good reliability except for the AP variable that showed low reliability. Good to excellent reliability was found in sway area variable (ICCs between 0.74 and 0.92) for all measurements. Significance: Postural sway measure by Swaymeter was valid and reliable in typically developing children aged 7–12 years and suitable for applying to assess postural sway in typically developing children.en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe validity and reliability of the Swaymeter for postural sway measurement in typically developing children aged between 7–12 yearsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleGait and Postureen_US
article.volume66en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.