Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62424
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChaiwat Bumroongkiten_US
dc.contributor.authorChalerm Liwsrisakunen_US
dc.contributor.authorAthavudh Deesomchoken_US
dc.contributor.authorTheerakorn Theerakittikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorChaicharn Pothiraten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-11T09:27:10Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-11T09:27:10Z-
dc.date.issued2005-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-20444462681en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=20444462681&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62424-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the efficacy of the protocol-directed weaning from a mechanical ventilator compared to physician-directed weaning. Material and Method: A comparative study between retrospective studies of physician-directed weaning as controls (N = 198) reviewed from July 2000 to July 2002 and the prospective studies of protocol-directed weaning as intervention (N = 196) enrolled from October 2002 to October 2003 in the medical ICU of Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, tertiary care center of northern Thailand. Study results were concluded by Fisher's exact test. Results: Baseline characteristics data of both groups including sex, age, illness severity which demonstrated by APACHE II score and PaO2/FiO2 ratio, causes of respiratory failure and mode of mechanical ventilation used were similar. The duration of mechanical ventilation before weaning was 5.89 ± 3.71 days in the protocol-directed group and 7.41 ± 5.54 days in the physician-directed group (p < 0.05). Weaning duration in the protocol-directed group was significantly shorter than the physician-directed group (14.58 ± 16.98 hours VS 47.09 ± 38.23 hours; p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meire analysis demonstrated that patients in the protocol-directed group had significantly shorter durations of mechanical ventilation compared to patients in the physician-directed group (p = 0.001, log-rank test). The ICU LOS was significantly shorter in the protocol-directed group (7.91 ± 4.71 vs 11.53 ± 7.80 days; p < 0.05). The 28 days mortality rate and the incidence of hospital acquired pneumonia seemed to be less in the protocol-directed group (4.60% vs 6.10% and 5.60% vs 10.10% consecutively) and reintubation rate seemed to be higher in the protocol-directed group (6.1% vs 4.5%) than the physician-directed group but differences were not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Protocol-directed weaning proved to have more efficacy in weaning patients from a ventilator than physician-directed weaning in terms of weaning duration and ICU length of stay without a deteriorating effect to the patients.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of weaning protocol in medical intensive care unit of tertiary care centeren_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of the Medical Association of Thailanden_US
article.volume88en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.