Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61779
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKabkaew L. Sukontasonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaitoon Narongchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorChaturong Kanchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorKarnda Vichairaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSomsak Piangjaien_US
dc.contributor.authorWorachote Boonsriwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorNophawan Bunchuen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuanghatai Sripakdeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorTarinee Chaiwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorBudsabong Kuntalueen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirisuda Siriwattanarungseeen_US
dc.contributor.authorKom Sukontasonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-11T08:59:06Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-11T08:59:06Z-
dc.date.issued2006-12-20en_US
dc.identifier.issn03790738en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-33749441875en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33749441875&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61779-
dc.description.abstractIn Thailand, the hairy maggots of the blow flies, Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) and Chrysomya villeneuvi Patton, are of forensic importance. Both flies are closely related species, not only in the morphological appearance of their larvae and puparia, but also on the aggressive feeding habit of the former. In our continuing studies of forensically important flies, identification of immature ones needs particular attention. In this study, we reported the morphological comparison between the puparia of these two blow fly species using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Observation revealed that the cuticular sculpture of tubercles along the dorsal and lateral segments had markedly different features: with C. rufifacies having many sharp spines assembling only at the tip, while of C. villeneuvi bore stout spines throughout the tubercle. A larger number of globules at the bubble membrane on the dorsolateral border of the fifth segment was found in C. villeneuvi (average 225) than in C. rufifacies (average 35), and more papillae was observed on the anterior spiracle in C. villeneuvi (13-15) than in C. rufifacies (9-12). However, the morphology of distinct net-like patches of the integument and structure of the posterior spiracle of both species were almost identical. Morphological comparison in this study permitted identification of the puparia of both fly species, particularly in areas where they co-exist. © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleMorphological comparison between Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) and Chrysomya villeneuvi Patton (Diptera: Calliphoridae) puparia, forensically important blow fliesen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleForensic Science Internationalen_US
article.volume164en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.