Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61259
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mansing Ratanasukon | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Siriraksa Visaetsilpanonta | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Prut Hanutsaha | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Direk Patikulsila | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-10T04:07:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-10T04:07:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007-10-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 01252208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 01252208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-35848940728 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=35848940728&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61259 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and non-AMD in Thais, and compare with the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) and Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) study. Material and Method: The authors prospectively evaluated all data of 51 eyes of 51 patients who had undergone PDT and accomplished a 1-year follow up. The assessments were divided into two categories: group 1 included three subsets of AMD, and group 2 was non-AMD. The first group classified into three subgroups: group1A: AMD with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and TAP/VIP compatible with recommendation guidelines characteristics, group 1B: AMD with subfoveal CNV and TAP/VIP incompatible, and group 1C: AMD with non-subfoveal CNV. The measurement outcomes comprised of the baseline characteristics, change in visual acuity, and number of treatments. Results: Thirty-eight eyes had CNV-related AMD and 13 eyes were non-AMD. At the 12-month examination, the mean visual acuity change in group 1A, 1B, 1C had increased 0.19 (p = 0.077), 0.14 (p = 0.076), and 0.24 (p = 0.003), respectively. The number of treatments was 1.8 in group 1A, 2.3 in group 1B, and 1.5 in group 1C. Conclusion: PDT is beneficial to Thai patients with AMD at first year, even if they were not compatible with TAP/VIP criteria. | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Photodynamic therapy for AMD and non-AMD patients: One-year results in Thais | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand | en_US |
article.volume | 90 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Prince of Songkla University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Mahidol University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.