Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59329
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJefferson Foxen_US
dc.contributor.authorYayoi Fujitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDimbab Ngidangen_US
dc.contributor.authorNancy Pelusoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLesley Potteren_US
dc.contributor.authorNiken Sakuntaladewien_US
dc.contributor.authorJanet Sturgeonen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid Thomasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T03:13:51Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T03:13:51Z-
dc.date.issued2009-05-19en_US
dc.identifier.issn03007839en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-67651174310en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10745-009-9240-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67651174310&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/59329-
dc.description.abstractFor centuries swidden was an important farming practice found across the girth of Southeast Asia. Today, however, these systems are changing and sometimes disappearing at a pace never before experienced. In order to explain the demise or transitioning of swidden we need to understand the rapid and massive changes that have and are occurring in the political and economic environment in which these farmers operate. Swidden farming has always been characterized by change, but since the onset of modern independent nation states, governments and markets in Southeast Asia have transformed the terms of swiddeners' everyday lives to a degree that is significantly different from that ever experienced before. In this paper we identified six factors that have contributed to the demise or transformation of swidden systems, and support these arguments with examples from China (Xishuangbanna), Laos, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia. These trends include classifying swiddeners as ethnic minorities within nation-states, dividing the landscape into forest and permanent agriculture, expansion of forest departments and the rise of conservation, resettlement, privatization and commoditization of land and land-based production, and expansion of market infrastructure and the promotion of industrial agriculture. In addition we note a growing trend toward a transition from rural to urban livelihoods and expanding urban-labor markets.en_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titlePolicies, political-economy, and Swidden in southeast asiaen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleHuman Ecologyen_US
article.volume37en_US
article.stream.affiliationsEast West Centreen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Chicagoen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversiti Malaysia Sarawaken_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of California, Berkeleyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsAustralian National Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsWorld Agroforestry Centreen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSimon Fraser Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.