Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/58366
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNarongsak Thongpapanlen_US
dc.contributor.authorEugene Kaciaken_US
dc.contributor.authorDianne H.B. Welshen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T04:23:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T04:23:12Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn13552554en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85046040900en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1108/IJEBR-03-2018-0135en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046040900&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/58366-
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore whether job rotation strategies and joint reward systems are equally effective in encouraging cross-functional collaboration (CFC) under all organizational contexts, ranging from young and small firms to mature and large ones. Design/methodology/approach: To ensure a wide applicability of findings in this study, the research model and hypotheses were tested with a sample of 232 Canadian firms active in a variety of industrial sectors. A survey instrument that comprised all the questionnaire items corresponding to the examined constructs is the foundation of the data used in this contribution. Findings: This study shows that job rotation and joint rewards are strong and positive drivers of interdepartmental collaboration, which subsequently enhance firm performance. However, this illustration must be considered in the context of the firm shaped by its size and age because these two variables strongly and negatively moderate the relationships between CFC and its two antecedents. Research limitations/implications: The study was limited to Canadian firms only. The manufacturing sector was not differentiated into subsectors, such as technology. Future studies could compare subsectors of manufacturing to see if there is any correlation between types of industries, age, and size. Originality/value: Not all firms will be able to take advantage of the widely accepted values of job rotation and joint reward systems in generating CFC. Firms, to an extent, appear to be confronted with the liability of aging but not with the liability of smallness.en_US
dc.subjectBusiness, Management and Accountingen_US
dc.titleGrowing and aging of entrepreneurial firms: Implications for job rotation and joint rewarden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Researchen_US
article.stream.affiliationsBrock Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsKozminski Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThe University of North Carolina at Greensboroen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.