Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/58208
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEmiel O. Hoogendijken_US
dc.contributor.authorJudith J.M. Rijnharten_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul Kowalen_US
dc.contributor.authorMario U. Pérez-Zepedaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatteo Cesarien_US
dc.contributor.authorPedro Abizandaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTeresa Flores Ruanoen_US
dc.contributor.authorAstrid Schop-Etmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartijn Huismanen_US
dc.contributor.authorElsa Denten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T04:21:06Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T04:21:06Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18734111en_US
dc.identifier.issn03785122en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85048979942en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.06.011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048979942&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/58208-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Elsevier B.V. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate socioeconomic inequalities in frailty among older adults in six low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and to examine to what extent chronic diseases account for these inequalities. Study design: Data were used from the Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE) wave 1 (2007–2010). Nationally representative samples of adults aged 50+ years from China, Ghana, India, Mexico, the Russian Federation and South Africa were analyzed (n = 31,174). Main outcome measures: Educational level and wealth were used as socioeconomic indicators. Frailty was assessed with modified criteria for the frailty phenotype. Self-reported disease diagnoses were used. A relative index of inequality (RII) was calculated to compare socioeconomic inequalities in frailty between countries. Results: People in lower socioeconomic positions had higher prevalence rates of frailty. The largest inequalities in frailty were found in Mexico (RII 3.7, 95% CI 2.1–6.4), and the smallest inequalities in Ghana (RII 1.1, 95% CI 0.7–1.8). Mediation analyses revealed that the chronic diseases considered in this study do not explain the higher prevalence of frailty seen in lower socioeconomic groups. Conclusions: Substantial socioeconomic inequalities in frailty were observed in LMICs, but additional research is needed to find explanations for these. Given that the population of older adults in many LMICs is expanding at a greater rate than in many high-income countries, our results indicate an urgent public health need to address frailty in these countries.en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSocioeconomic inequalities in frailty among older adults in six low- and middle-income countries: Results from the WHO Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE)en_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleMaturitasen_US
article.volume115en_US
article.stream.affiliationsVU University Medical Centeren_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsOrganisation Mondiale de la Santeen_US
article.stream.affiliationsInstituto Nacional de Geriatria, Mexicoen_US
article.stream.affiliationsPontificia Universidad Javerianaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsOspedale Maggiore Policlinico Milanoen_US
article.stream.affiliationsComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albaceteen_US
article.stream.affiliationsErasmus University Medical Centeren_US
article.stream.affiliationsErasmus University Rotterdamen_US
article.stream.affiliationsVrije Universiteit Amsterdamen_US
article.stream.affiliationsTorrens University Australiaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsBaker Heart and Diabetes Instituteen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.