Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57752
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTanwiwat Jaikunaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhatchareewan Khadsirien_US
dc.contributor.authorNisa Chawapunen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuwit Saekhoen_US
dc.contributor.authorEkkasit Tharavichitkulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T03:49:10Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T03:49:10Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-28en_US
dc.identifier.issn1689832Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85016191946en_US
dc.identifier.other10.5114/jcb.2017.66082en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85016191946&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57752-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To develop an in-house software program that is able to calculate and generate the biological dose distribution and biological dose volume histogram by physical dose conversion using the linear-quadratic-linear (LQL) model. Material and methods: The Isobio software was developed using MATLAB version 2014b to calculate and generate the biological dose distribution and biological dose volume histograms. The physical dose from each voxel in treatment planning was extracted through Computational Environment for Radiotherapy Research (CERR), and the accuracy was verified by the differentiation between the dose volume histogram from CERR and the treatment planning system. An equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction (EQD2) was calculated using biological effective dose (BED) based on the LQL model. The software calculation and the manual calculation were compared for EQD2 verification with pair t-test statistical analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 (64-bit). Results: Two and three-dimensional biological dose distribution and biological dose volume histogram were displayed correctly by the Isobio software. Different physical doses were found between CERR and treatment planning system (TPS) in Oncentra, with 3.33% in high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) determined by D90%, 0.56% in the bladder, 1.74% in the rectum when determined by D2cc, and less than 1% in Pinnacle. The difference in the EQD2 between the software calculation and the manual calculation was not significantly different with 0.00% at p-values 0.820, 0.095, and 0.593 for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and 0.240, 0.320, and 0.849 for brachytherapy (BT) in HR-CTV, bladder, and rectum, respectively. Conclusions: The Isobio software is a feasible tool to generate the biological dose distribution and biological dose volume histogram for treatment plan evaluation in both EBRT and BT.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleIsobio software: Biological dose distribution and biological dose volume histogram from physical dose conversion using linear-quadratic-linear modelen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Contemporary Brachytherapyen_US
article.volume9en_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Assoc. Medical Sciencesen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.