Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57573
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlex Carballo-Diéguezen_US
dc.contributor.authorRebecca Giguereen_US
dc.contributor.authorCurtis Dolezalen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheng Shiun Leuen_US
dc.contributor.authorIván C. Balánen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliam Brownen_US
dc.contributor.authorChristine Raelen_US
dc.contributor.authorBarbra A. Richardsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeanna M. Piperen_US
dc.contributor.authorLinda Gail Bekkeren_US
dc.contributor.authorSuwat Chariyalertsaken_US
dc.contributor.authorAnupong Chitwarakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorPedro Gonzalesen_US
dc.contributor.authorTimothy H. Holtzen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlbert Liuen_US
dc.contributor.authorKenneth H. Mayeren_US
dc.contributor.authorCarmen D. Zorrillaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJavier R. Lamaen_US
dc.contributor.authorIan McGowanen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoss D. Cranstonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T03:46:09Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T03:46:09Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15733254en_US
dc.identifier.issn10907165en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85033365678en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10461-017-1969-1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85033365678&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57573-
dc.description.abstract© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can prevent HIV transmission. Yet, some may prefer not to take systemic daily medication. MTN-017 was a 3-period, phase 2 safety and acceptability study of microbicide gel applied rectally either daily or before and after receptive anal intercourse (RAI), compared to daily oral tablet. At baseline, cisgender men and transgender women who reported RAI (N = 187) rated the daily oral regimen higher in overall liking, ease of use, and likelihood of future use than the gel regimens. After trying all three, 28% liked daily oral the least. Gel did not affect sexual enjoyment (88%) or improved it (7–8%). Most partners had no reaction to gel use. Ease of gel use improved significantly between the first and the last few times of daily use. A rectal gel used before and after RAI may constitute an attractive alternative to daily tablet. Experience with product use may increase acceptability.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titlePreference of Oral Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine Versus Rectal Tenofovir Reduced-Glycerin 1% Gel Regimens for HIV Prevention Among Cisgender Men and Transgender Women Who Engage in Receptive Anal Intercourse with Menen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleAIDS and Behavioren_US
article.volume21en_US
article.stream.affiliationsNew York State Psychiatric Instituteen_US
article.stream.affiliationsDepartment of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSan Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Centeren_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Washington, Seattleen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseasesen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Cape Townen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsCenters for Disease Control (CDC), Thailand Field Stationen_US
article.stream.affiliationsAsociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educaciónen_US
article.stream.affiliationsCenters for Disease Control and Preventionen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSan Francisco Department of Public Healthen_US
article.stream.affiliationsBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Centeren_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Puerto Ricoen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Pittsburghen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.