Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57443
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorD. L. Manaloen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Yamadaen_US
dc.contributor.authorI. Watanabeen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. E.G. Mirandaen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. M.D. Lapizen_US
dc.contributor.authorE. Tapdasanen_US
dc.contributor.authorW. Petspophonsakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Inoueen_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Khawploden_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Nishizonoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T03:41:28Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T03:41:28Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18632378en_US
dc.identifier.issn18631959en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85002897251en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1111/zph.12313en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85002897251&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57443-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 The Authors. Zoonoses and Public Health published by Blackwell Verlag GmbH. The mass vaccination of dogs against rabies is a highly rational strategy for interrupting the natural transmission of urban rabies. According to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) and the World Health Organization (WHO), the immunization of at least 70% of the total dog population minimizes the risk of endemic rabies. Knowledge of the virus-neutralizing antibody (VNA) level against the rabies virus (RABV) is required to evaluate protective immunity and vaccine coverage of dogs in the field. The rapid focus fluorescent inhibition test (RFFIT) and the fluorescent antibody virus neutralization (FAVN) test are recommended by OIE and WHO to determine the VNA levels in serum. However, these tests are cell culture based and require the use of live viruses and specialized equipment. The rapid neutralizing antibody test (RAPINA) is a novel, immunochromatographic test that uses inactivated virus to estimate the VNA level qualitatively. It is a simple, rapid and inexpensive, although indirect, assay for the detection of VNA levels. The RAPINA has shown good positive and negative predictive values and a high concordance with the RFFIT results. In this study, we compared the performance of the two tests for evaluating the vaccination status of dogs in the Philippines, Thailand and Japan. A total of 1135 dog sera were analysed by the RAPINA and compared to the VNA levels determined by the RFFIT. The overall positive and negative predictive values of the RAPINA were 96.2–99.3% and 84.5–94.8%, respectively, with a concordance (kappa) of 0.946–0.97 among the three countries. The RAPINA results were highly homologous and reproducible among different laboratories. These results suggest that this test is appropriate to survey vaccination coverage in countries with limited resources.en_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectVeterinaryen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Study of the RAPINA and the Virus-Neutralizing Test (RFFIT) for the Estimation of Antirabies-Neutralizing Antibody Levels in Dog Samplesen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleZoonoses and Public Healthen_US
article.volume64en_US
article.stream.affiliationsResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine (RITM-DOH)en_US
article.stream.affiliationsOita Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsOffice of the Provincial Veterinarianen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNational Institute of Infectious Diseasesen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThai Red Cross Agencyen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.