Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57394
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMelvin Lippeen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas Hilgeren_US
dc.contributor.authorSureeporn Sudchaleeen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaruthep Wechpibalen_US
dc.contributor.authorAttachai Jintraweten_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorg Cadischen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T03:40:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T03:40:01Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn2073445Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85044758739en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3390/land6040085en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044758739&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/57394-
dc.description.abstract© 2017 by the authors. The objective of this study was to examine whether the coupling of a land-use change (LUC) model with a carbon-stock accounting approach and participatory procedures can be beneficial in a data-limited environment to derive implications for environmental management. Stakeholder-based LUC scenarios referring to different storylines of agricultural intensification and reforestation were simulated to explore their impact on above-ground carbon (AGC) for a period of twenty years (2009-2029). The watershed of Mae Sa Mai, Northern Thailand was used as a case study for this purpose. Coupled model simulations revealed that AGC stocks could be increased by up to 1.7 Gg C through expansion of forests or orchard areas. A loss of up to 0.4 Gg C would occur if vegetable production continue to expand at the expense of orchard and fallow areas. The coupled model approach was useful due to its moderate data demands, enabling the comparison of land-use types differing in AGC build-up rates and rotation times. The scenario analysis depicted clear differences in the occurrence of LUC hotspots, highlighting the importance of assessing the impact of potential future LUC pathways at the landscape level. The use of LUC scenarios based on local stakeholder scenarios offer a higher credibility for climate mitigation strategies but also underline the need to co-design policy frameworks that acknowledge the heterogeneity of stakeholder needs and environmental management frameworks.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleSimulating stakeholder-based land-use change scenarios and their implication on above-ground carbon and environmental management in Northern Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleLanden_US
article.volume6en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversitat Hohenheimen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Medical Collegeen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThünen Institute of International Forestry and Forest Economicsen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.