Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56241
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoderick J. Finlaysonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Paul B. Etheridgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorPornpan Chalermkitpaniten_US
dc.contributor.authorWorakamol Tiyaprasertkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorBill Nelemsen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Q.H. Tranen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarc A. Huntoonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T03:11:20Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T03:11:20Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15328651en_US
dc.identifier.issn10987339en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84959362254en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1097/AAP.0000000000000363en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959362254&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/56241-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2016 by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Background and Objectives: Compared with the thoracic and lumbar spine, transforaminal epidural injections and medial branch blocks in the cervical spine are associated with a higher incidence of neurological complications. Accidental breach of small periforaminal arteries has been implicated inmany instances. In this observational study, using ultrasonography, we surveyed the incidence of periforaminal bloods vessels in the cervical spine. Methods: Patients undergoing ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks were scanned using color power and pulsed wave Doppler. Five levels from C2/C3 to C6/C7 were studied. Incidental blood vessels located between the anterior tubercles of the transverses process and the posterior borders of the articular pillars were included for analysis. We recorded the diameter and position of arteries relative to contiguous bony landmarks as well the number of veins. Results: In 102 patients, we performed a total 201 scans (1005 cervical levels). Of the 363 incidental vessels identified, 238 were arteries (mean diameter, 1.25 ± 0.45 mm). The latter were most commonly found at the posterior foraminal aspects of C5, C6, and C7 (13%, 11%, and 16% of scans, respectively); the transverse processes of C5 and C6 (10% and 16% of scans, respectively); and the articular pillars of C6 and C7 (19% and 16% of scans, respectively). Conclusions: Small periforaminal arteries are prevalent along the lateral aspect of the cervical spine, adjacent to areas commonly targeted by nerve block procedures. Further trials are required to determine if ultrasound guidance can reduce the incidence of complications related to accidental vascular breach.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleReal-time detection of periforaminal vessels in the cervical spine: An ultrasound surveyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicineen_US
article.volume41en_US
article.stream.affiliationsCentre universitaire de sante McGillen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThe University of British Columbiaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChulalongkorn Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsVanderbilt Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospitalen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.